409bcad9   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: noydb@no.way   
      
   In article <2e43e$566e0cb4$58b0f472$15947@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com>,   
   "Paul M. Cook"  wrote:   
   >On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:51:53 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:   
   >   
   >> Because it isn't about OWNERSHIP.   
   >>   
   >>> You hate good data.   
   >>   
   >> You have no good data on CELLPHONE USE WHEN DRIVING.   
   >   
   >Exactly my point!   
   >My data matches perfectly!   
   >   
   >The data doesn't match for those who claim that cellphone use is dangerous!   
   >   
   >We all can agree the only good data we have is:   
   >1. Accident rates, and,   
   >2. Cellphone ownership.   
   >   
   >We can all agree that the really bad data is:   
   >3. Cellphone use while driving   
   >4. Accidents related to cellphone use while driving   
      
   Nope. Using a phone while driving has been conclusively shown to be dangerous.   
   Something to do with loss of peripheral vision (and recently it's become clear   
   that processing data from 2 senses ... eg sight and sound ... is not possible   
   at the same time).   
      
   People can say they disagree and that 'the data is not clear'. That's because   
   they want to continue being stupid in a car. As long as they do that far away   
   from me, that's fine.  :) :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)