XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android
From: g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies
In message <0001HW.1C3EA5620A97227714E7EF3CF@news.giganews.com>
Savageduck wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2016, Lewis wrote
> (in article ):
>> In message<0001HW.1C3E09990A729FAC14E7EF3CF@news.giganews.com>
>> Savageduck wrote:
>> > On Jan 6, 2016, Lewis wrote
>> > (in article):
>>
>> > > In message
>> > > (PeteCresswell) wrote:
>> > > > Per Jolly Roger:
>> > > > > Indeed. They generally are not held to a higher standard, which is
> why
>> > more
>> > > > > citizens are recording them with greater scrutiny than ever before.
>> > >
>> > > > The Rodney King thing was when? 1991? 1992?....
>> > >
>> > > > Now it's been something like 20 years that police have been on notice
>> > > > that they just might be on Candid Camera.
>> > >
>> > > > How dense does somebody have to be to not get that message and shoot
>> > > > some guy sixteen times in the back..... or blow away some kid that's
> 25'
>> > > > away, not a threat, and obviously intoxicated ?
>> > >
>> > > > I wonder if IQ tests would help....
>> > >
>> > > The hiring profile for law enforcement is for a person with a 105-115
>> > > IQ. Smart people do not get hired.
>>
>> > For the New London PD.
>>
>> I am not familiar with either New London nor its police department.
> It is the New London, Connecticut PD which is the subject of the article
> rejecting a potential recruit for having an IQ which was estimated as too
> high. Apparently New London is the Mayberry of the East where Barney Fife was
> the model officer.
An article I have not read nor made any reference to.
--
Once again I teeter at the precipice of the generation gap.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
