XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies   
      
   In message    
     The Real Bev  wrote:   
   > On 01/06/2016 03:47 PM, Lewis wrote:   
   >> In message <0001HW.1C3CCACE0A27E8AF10CF373CF@news.giganews.com>   
   >>    Savageduck  wrote:   
   >>> On Jan 5, 2016, F Murtz wrote   
   >>> (in article<568c8dc3$0$65279$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>):   
   >>   
   >>>> PAS wrote:   
   >>>> > "Jolly Roger"wrote in message   
   >>>> > news:devqebF4fotU3@mid.individual.net...   
   >>>> > > On 2016-01-04, Jolly Roger wrote:   
   >>>> > > > (PeteCresswell)wrote:   
   >>>> > > > > Per Lewis:   
   >>>> > > > > > > That if anyone finds his phone laying on a desk or table etc   
   they   
   >>>> > > > > > > can cause   
   >>>> > > > > > > it to self-destruct in just five touches.   
   >>>> > > > > >   
   >>>> > > > > > What the fuck are you talking about>   
   >>>> > > > >   
   >>>> > > > > I think he is referring to phone security systems that initiate   
   data   
   >>>> > > > > deletion if/when somebody attempts to log on with the wrong PW.   
   >>>> > > >   
   >>>> > > > What does that have to do with a law that prevents cops from   
   accessing   
   >>> a   
   >>>> > > > device without a court order?   
   >>>> > >   
   >>>> > > More to the point: Since the law prohibits cops from accessing devices   
   >>>> > > without a court order, the need for wiping the device after a certain   
   >>>> > > number of failed attempts is diminished rather than increased.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > It's not safe to assume that the cops will obey the law. For example,   
   >>>> > it's Constitutionally protected under the 1st Amendment to   
   >>>> > photograph/record the police in public. That hasn't stopped the police   
   >>>> > from arresting people for doing it at worst, harassing them for doing it   
   >>>> > at best.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And if they do access your phone and find something then even without   
   >>>> being able to use it they then know you are suss and can concentrate on   
   >>>> finding legal evidence   
   >>   
   >>> ...and that is only bad for you, if you are a criminal. Strangely enough   
   >>> there are a few of those out there.   
   >>   
   >> Oh right, because the police and the prosecutors never set out a   
   >> multi-year systematic system of intentionally framing and convicting   
   >> people they *know* are innocent?   
   >>   
   >> Oh wait, that happens *every* *fucking* *day*.   
      
   > I just binge-watched Making A Murderer.  Not a single member of the   
   > legal establishment involved, most especially the judges and juries who   
   > should have stood up halfway through the trials and demanded that the   
   > cases be dismissed immediately, was anything but evil.   
      
   But that is every day in every court in every state. The US Justice   
   system is a machine that will do *anything* for a conviction and to get   
   another paying customer into long-term incarceration.   
      
      
   --   
   You only had to look into Teatime's mismatched eyes to know one thing,   
   which was this: if Teatime wanted to find you he would not look   
   everywhere. He'd look in only one place, which would be the place where   
   you were hiding. --Hogfather   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)