Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,874 of 20,339    |
|    pamela to Alice J.    |
|    Re: Are we all handing to Google the SSI    |
|    04 Feb 16 23:14:26    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.internet.wireless       From: invalid@nospam.com              On 18:58 4 Feb 2016, Alice J. wrote:              > pamela wrote in message XnsA5A4A8284F67BD4AM2@207.246.207.124:       >       >> Changing the User Agent String doesn't stop Chrome and Firefox from       >> being identified by their unique browser ID number.       >>       >> See your browser's number here:       >> http://ip-check.info/       >       > Wait a minute? Something smells fishy.       >       > I went to that site and it did report two supposedly unique browser       > IDs: https://i.imgur.com/naT9m31.gif       >       > But, if they're such a fingerprinting threat, why doesn't Panopticlick       > report them?              I don't know how the browser IDs are assigned or why your cached version is       different.              Here's a discussion. Soemone says it's stored in a cookie, so you may be       able to hex edit it.              http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/firefox-unique-id-others.320123/              --       pamela              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca