XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: algeriahoran@algeriahoran.net   
      
   Algeria Horan wrote:   
      
   > nospam wrote:   
   >   
   >> nonsense.   
   >>   
   >> apple's products are *very* competitive. they have to be.   
   >>   
   >> if their products had such a dismal price/performance as you claim,   
   >> their sales would not be anywhere near what they are.   
   >   
   > Heh heh ... you *completely* misconstrued my words.   
   >   
   > I never said that Apple phones lacked "performance", just as I never said   
   > the Pixel phones lack *performance*.   
   >   
   > What I said, very clearly, was that the price:performance ratio is dismally   
   > low.   
   >   
   > Apple phones are fantastic if you can get them for free.   
   > They're even a great deal if you can get them for the price of sales tax.   
   > Same with the Pixel phones.   
   >   
   > They're all high-end phones.   
   > However, the price:performance ratio is dismal.   
   >   
   > I'm sure I can find an equal-or-better phone (for the specs that matter to   
   > me), for far less money, which raises the price:performance ratio to an   
   > acceptable level.   
   >   
   > Up until now, I've been buying the Nexus and Moto phones from Google, but   
   > they had better price:performance ratios than does this Pixel line of   
   > phones (which has exactly the same utterly dismal price:performance ratio   
   > as the Apple iPhone 7 line of phones).   
      
   Please cancel that message as I was in err in that I responded too hastily   
   and misconstrued myself what you had said. See my other response, which   
   admits that I made a mistake in this post above, and for that, I apologize.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)