XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: nospam@nospam.invalid   
      
   In article , Algeria Horan   
    wrote:   
      
   > > apple's products are *very* competitive. they have to be.   
   > >   
   > > if their products had such a dismal price/performance as you claim,   
   > > their sales would not be anywhere near what they are.   
   >   
   > The previous post was in error as I misconstrued your words.   
   > I apologize. I was in a rush, and I didn't read properly (so I am guilty of   
   > that which I accuse you of, and for that I apologize).   
      
   you never read properly. you always twist and lie and argue about stuff   
   never said.   
      
   > You state that Apple phones are competitive, but I have posted in the past   
   > entire threads showing that essentially equivalent phones (for the things   
   > that matter to me) are *half* the price.   
      
   no you haven't.   
      
   > Now, to stay on topic, the Pixel line of phones is *exactly* the same price   
   > (and performance) as the iPhone 7 line of phones.   
      
   they're comparable. the pixel is a little better in some ways and not   
   as good in others. pick whatever best fits your needs.   
      
   > So, it remains to be seen if the iPhone 7 is "competitive" with the Pixel   
   > line of phones.   
      
   no need to wait. it's *very* clear they're competitive.   
      
   > Personally, I think the Pixel line of phones is priced too high for Android   
   > users for the specifications that they have; but the actual fact is up to   
   > the sales figures and not up to me to say.   
      
   that's because you're a cheapskate who won't even spend 99 cents on an   
   app.   
      
   you want everything for free.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)