XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone
From: rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com
Algeria Horan wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>>> 12. NFC seems slightly better on the Pixel than on the iPhone 7
>> But apple doesn't allow apps to access that which is better for
>> security but may not be as good if you donąt care about security.
> I have never understood NFC, simply because I have it on
> my S3 and I've never had a need to even *care* about NFC.
Because you are a dinosaur that is too stupid to use cards, let alone the
modern incarnation of them, Apple Pay, Android Pay and Samsung Pay.
> So, since I'm ignorant of NFC, I only read the spec as something
> like "the pixel can do everything with NFC while the iPhone 7
> can only do some things with NFC".
Yes, apps on iOS devices can't use NFC, only iOS can do that.
> I guess what you're saying is that this is true, but because
> of the Apple limitations, then NFC "security" is better.
Yes, no malicious app can use the NFC on an iOS device.
> If that's the case, neither is better;
That is just plain wrong if you care about security.
> they're just different where Apple (as usual) is more
> restrictive and Google (as usual) is more open.
Even sillier and an even more pathetic excuse for a troll than you usually
manage.
>>> Looking up the price for a 32GB version of each:
>>> Pixel = $650
>>> iPhone 7 = $650
>> That's a bit low end IMO.
> I don't understand that comment since I googled for the price
> and it seems that the Google Pixel price is exactly the same as
> the Apple iPhone 7 price, which, I'm sure, is no coincidence.
I meant that 32GB versions of phones is very low end now.
> Did I get the prices wrong?
Nope.
> What are the correct prices for a 32GB version of each phone?
The problem wasnt with the price, its which model you
priced, the lowest GB version.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
