XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: nospam@nospam.invalid   
      
   In article , Harold Newton   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> Then AT&T wouldn't let *new* phones block data   
   > >   
   > > they don't prevent it.   
   > >   
   > >> (it's more complex than   
   > >> that, but that's not the point here)   
   > >   
   > > it is the point because once again, you're wrong.   
   >   
   > First off, you are so desperate to find a single statement from me that is   
   > factually wrong, that you'll grasp at *anything*, even when I said I was   
   > simplifying the details.   
      
   i'm not desperate at all. just about everything you say is wrong.   
      
   > Do you think that I don't have an FCC complaint that has *all* the gory   
   > details, and that I didn't get a call from AT&T Marketing telling me that   
   > they would charge me for data even if I had a data block if I put the SIM   
   > card in a phone that they considered a "smartphone"?   
      
   their smartphone plans include data.   
      
   you were trying to get away with scamming them and they caught you.   
      
   that's also different from blocking data, something that's trivially   
   done on any carrier and there's no way to block that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|