XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: harold@example.com   
      
   On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:06:48 -0500, nospam wrote:   
      
   >>   
   >> Then AT&T wouldn't let *new* phones block data   
   >   
   > they don't prevent it.   
   >   
   >> (it's more complex than   
   >> that, but that's not the point here)   
   >   
   > it is the point because once again, you're wrong.   
      
   First off, you are so desperate to find a single statement from me that is   
   factually wrong, that you'll grasp at *anything*, even when I said I was   
   simplifying the details.   
      
   Do you think that I don't have an FCC complaint that has *all* the gory   
   details, and that I didn't get a call from AT&T Marketing telling me that   
   they would charge me for data even if I had a data block if I put the SIM   
   card in a phone that they considered a "smartphone"?   
      
   You're so desperate to find something, anything, that I've said that you   
   can claim isn't factual that the next thing we'll see is you finding a typo   
   and claiming that it's not factual.   
      
   Grow some balls. And some brains.   
   You'll never find me stating a mistruth because I'm not like you.   
      
   I say the truth - you never say the truth.   
   Don't think I'm like you.   
      
   You're like Peter Madsen. A perfect double. And James Comey.   
   You don't even believe 95% of what you say.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)