Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,350 of 20,339    |
|    Ragnusen Ultred to All    |
|    Re: Does anyone know what phone the now-    |
|    22 Mar 18 17:59:56    |
      XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android       From: rragnusen@ultred.com              Am Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:11:46 +0000, schrieb Chris:              > Not in this case. It seems clear that they were simply using cell-tower       > information to correlate his movements with the attacks and catch him.       > The type of phone is irrelevant.              It does seem that they tracked him by simple means, where he seems to have       been triangulated to each of the bomb sites, according to the news.              I find it odd that someone, planning a crime, would bring a cellphone along       with them on the crime.              It just seems stupid.              At this point, he's made a twenty-minute video which the police have       characterized as a confession, but it was all about the bombs, which is       odd, don't you think?              He seemed to be wrapped up in the /technology/ of the bombs, which is why       it matters what technology he chose for his phone.              Time will tell as it will come out, eventually, which phone he used, where       I'm only seeking to better understand the machinations of his mind since       most of us reasonable people would consider it extremely dumb to bring a       cell phone along while on a /planned/ crime spree.              >> Only someone who merely /felt/ safe from prying eyes, but who was not       >> actually safe from prying eyes, could possibly do such a stupid thing.       >       > Criminals are mostly stupid or thoughtless. The police aren't going to       > catch the smart, determined ones. They usually end up in positions of       > power where only the FBI/CIA/NSA might touch them.              Heh heh ... yeah. You're right. The best are those during the Harding and       Grant eras, where they made hundreds of millions of 1920's dollars, which       is likely billions in today's dollars.              James Comey comes to mind, when talking about criminal politicians, where       Comey wasn't even paid to be a sleazy politician - but he was nonetheless.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca