Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,570 of 20,339    |
|    sms to Arlen Holder    |
|    Re: New AppleCare+ options for the new l    |
|    17 Sep 18 14:16:01    |
      XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone       From: scharf.steven@geemail.com              On 9/17/2018 1:43 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:              > I'm fine that Apple iPhones have astronomical costs of ownership.              The cost is not astronomical when compared to flagship phones from other       manufacturers.              The 512GB Samsung Galaxy Note 9 is $1250. The 512GB iPhone Xs Max is       $1449. That's a $199 difference. Both are astronomically priced.              I have never seen anyone claim that comparable Android phones are not       less expensive than iPhones, at least initially.              You have to look at the big picture and also look at total cost of       ownership. How often does the average person change phones? What is the       resale value of an old phone? How long will the manufacturer issue       operating system updates? How easy is it to get the product repaired?       Most experts agree that the iPhone has a lower total cost of ownership       when compared to flagship Android phones.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca