XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, rec.photo.digital   
   From: arlen@arlen.com   
      
   On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:37:40 -0500, nospam wrote:   
      
   >> No, dxomark is garbage.   
   >   
   > it definitely is and attributing a single score is meaningless anyway.   
      
   Hi nospam,   
   Every time you and Lewis post, you prove you're idiots.   
   The "Alfred Molon" guy I don't know - but he proved to be an idiot too.   
      
   None of you comprehend even the _simplest_ of facts.   
   It's shocking, actually, that people like you even _exist_.   
      
   The Dunning-Kruger bank robber proved people with your minds exist.   
   What an _adult_ would say is that:   
   1. The iPhone appears to be in 2nd place overall; but 4th on selfie cams.   
   (That Alfred Molon didn't _comprehend_ that merely indicates the problem.)   
      
   2. The DXOMark scores are _not_ single scores, much as you, nospam, would   
   _love_ to spin that tall tale. They provide the testing criteria and the   
   scores in _each_ test.   
      
   For example:   
     "DxO has initially tested the front facing cameras of 12 popular   
      smartphones. As for how the iPhone XS Max and X performed   
      in the DxO selfie camera ranking, let's say they have some room   
      for improvement."   
      
      "The XS Max selfie camera scored particularly low for texture   
        and noise on the photo side and color and texture for video."   
      
   3. That you, nospam, and Lewis deprecate DXOMark is classic.   
   o *You dispute _all_ facts you don't like.*   
   o *Facts have no place to fit in your imaginary belief system.*   
      
   Meanwhile, you're welcome to be ignorant about DXOMark detailed line-item   
   tests, and you're even welcome to claim that DXOMark is garbage,   
   but, what you are not welcome is to act like the child you act like.   
      
   Show us something _better_ for mobile phone camera testing, nospam.   
   What's that?   
      
   You have nothing better?   
   Oh, I see.   
      
   So, you agree then that it's the _best_ we have?   
   And, you agree, nospam, that the full detailed tests are available right?   
      
   The fact is that you Apologists _believe_ in an imaginary belief system.   
   To prove you wrong, Lews, nospam (and Molon) takes all of 10 seconds.   
      
   You're all _that_ incredibly stupid (sadly to say).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)