XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps, comp.sys.mac.system   
   XPost: comp.mobile.ipad   
   From: arlen@arlen.com   
      
   On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:52:23 -0000 (UTC), Lewis wrote:   
      
   > S/He is a terribly insecure child who spends his days lying about   
   > everything s/he can.   
      
   Hi Lewis,   
      
   You're an Apple Apologists, so we're not going to be in the same league.   
   o (NOTE TO ADULTS: Adult response below - please appreciate the effort!)   
      
   I believe I understand you Lewis, inside and out.   
   o And yet, everything you post, indicates you don't understand my motive.   
      
   FACT + LOGIC   
   o That! Is my motive.   
      
   Even though I'm as simple as a rock to figure out.   
   o My strategy and tactics are consistent - which I've stated many times.   
      
   I'm going to point out what you SAY ... which are FACTS...   
   o and I will apply LOGIC to those facts of what you say   
      
   Are facts & logic OK with you, Lewis?   
      
   FACT: You like to infer that I am a girl, and a child, is that right Lewis?   
   LOGIC: That's the _best_ Lewis can do - because my FACTS are correct.   
      
   Notice also this FACT/LOGIC in what Lewis wrote above:   
   FACT: Lewis calls _me_ a child because I assert he has a child's mind.   
   LOGIC: Lewis can't _prove_ that assertion - he can only _make_ it.   
      
   Also notice:   
   FACT: Lews has never proven any _independent_ thought process.   
   LOGIC: All Lewis _can_ do, is parrot Apple (and even me).   
      
   Note how hilarious it is when the best that the Apologists _can_ do.   
   o Apologists simply _parrot_ that which someone else says!   
      
   HINT: Nospam and Jolly Roger and BK, et al. all do the same thing.   
   o They have no synapses devoted to _independent_ thought processes.   
      
   BTW, this is not just an idle assertion.   
   o I simply point out EXACTLY what Lewis says to prove my point.   
      
   >  S/He doesn't care what s/he says, s/he just wants as much   
   > attention as possible, and it doesn't matter if it's good or bad.   
      
   Again note that Lewis can _easily_ be proven dead wrong.   
      
   First off, I don't generally post to other people's threads.   
   Second off, _all_ my posts are on the same or similar set of topics.   
   Third off, I _break_ off conversations with Apologists all the time.   
   Fourth off, I _never_ use ad hominem attacks! (HINT: This is a fact!)   
   etc.   
      
   I could go on (and on) where it's people like Lewis who do all that.   
      
   The problem here is that Lewis is likely PROJECTING why _he_ does things.   
   o The real problem is that Lewis doesn't like the facts about Apple.   
      
   For example:   
   o He calls me a "girl" simply because he doesn't like those facts.   
      
   NOTE: I don't have to prove any of this any more than to POINT to exactly   
   what Lewis writes. Those _are_ my facts. Lewis proves them for me!   
      
   > fact, being as insecure as s/he is, bad is probably better so s/he can tell   
   > him/herself s/he is "standing up to oppressors" or some shit like that. He   
   > revels in his wrongness.   
      
   Actually, Lewis, I'm not insecure, despite the fact you _wish_ I were.   
   It's _you_ who is arguably the insecure one, simply because facts hurt you.   
      
   You see Lewis, facts don't hurt me one bit:   
   o Facts about Microsoft don't hurt me   
   o Facts about Linux don't hurt me   
   o Facts about Android don't hurt me   
   o Facts about iOS don't hurt me   
   etc.   
      
   But, to you Lewis, it appears very much that   
   o Facts about Apple _do_ hurt you (very much so), Lewis.   
      
   The question isn't whether facts hurt you Lewis, since they apparently do.   
   o The adult question is WHY do facts about Apple hurt you so much Lewis?   
      
   HINT: I know the answer; but do you?   
      
   > S/He is probably a flat-Earther, audiophile, fake moon landing, alien   
   > lizard government, scientologist Trump lover conspiracy nutter too.   
      
   Wow.   
   o Just wow.   
      
   Lewis ... you don't even realize what you just proved.   
   o Notice I speak only FACTS and defensible adult LOGIC.   
      
   Also notice that I _never_ once have said anything whatsoever about:   
   o Flat earth   
   o Fake moon landings   
   o Alien lizard government   
   o Scientology   
   o Or Trump   
      
   I shake my head in dismay that people like Lewis _actually_ exist.   
   o Lewis literally _believes_ what he wrote   
      
   Even in the total and complete absence of a single fact to support it!   
   o Do adults see why I argue Apologist belief systems are devoid of fact?   
      
   > The only way to deal with people like him/her is to not reply to them.   
      
   Hi Lewis,   
      
   Remember, we're not in the same league.   
   o People like Jolly Roger & Savageduck have figured that out.   
   o People like Alan Baker and BK have not figured that out.   
      
   Even people like nospam _can_ figure that out   
   o But nospam is in a different category from normal Apple Apologists.   
      
   I'm going to let you in on a bit of sincere adult advice, Lewis.   
   o The reason you _hate_ me is that I speak facts that you don't like   
   o Those facts do not fit into your _imaginary_ belief system.   
      
   It's really _that_ simple, Lewis.   
   o It's not that I'm a "girl" Lewis; it's that I speak facts you don't like.   
      
   > Once   
   > they stop getting the attention they need to feel like they are alive and   
   > tamp down the dead inside, s/he will go somewhere else.   
      
   Let me let you in on a _secret_ Lewis:   
   o I have a strategy; and I have tactics that support that strategy   
      
   Whether or not you post, Lewis, does not affect either.   
   o My strategy has been the same for years, Lewis (with or without you)   
   o My tactics (while they evolve) are the same (with or without you, Lewis)   
      
   You see, Lewis, _you_ are my _example_ ... but you're not the only one.   
   o There are a score of Apple Apologists, Lewis - you're not the only one.   
      
   > You can't argue crazy. You can't argue stupid. S/He's both.   
      
   What I _love_ about Lewis (and Jolly Roger), is that they prove my point in   
   every single line of every single one of their posts.   
      
   *I don't even have to prove the point since they prove it for me.*   
   o Every single time they post!   
      
   I simply point out that the _best_ argument Lewis has - against facts - is   
   o Facts must be wrong ... because ... I'm crazy (according to Lewis)   
   o Facts must be wrong ... because ... I'm stupid (according to Lewis)   
   o Facts must be wrong ... because ... I'm a girl (according to Lewis)   
      
   The _real_ question for you Lewis, is this simple:   
   o *Why do you so very much _hate_ true facts about Apple product?*   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)