Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,865 of 20,339    |
|    123456789 to Arlen G. Holder    |
|    Re: FCC proposes blocking robocalls by d    |
|    15 May 19 18:52:30    |
      XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android       From: 12345@12345.com              Arlen G. Holder wrote:              > I don't know what technology the carriers would choose to       > implement, where I could perhaps assume the carriers       > (combined or alone) might have access to systemic       > "characteristic dialing patterns" that we, as recipients,       > won't have access to.              My home phone (Cox) gives me free access to Nomorobo. Since       installing it my junk calls have decreased by more than 80%.       But some still get through. My understanding is that they       compare the incoming number with a spam database and a match       triggers a hangup. It does require one ring to work and that       still might be annoying to some, but thankfully my cordless       phone system can be programmed to silence the first ring so       I get blessed complete silence...              Likewise Verizon now has a free app that does the same for       their cell customers. The wife's cell phone has also had a       dramatic drop in spam calls since installation.              But my cell phone is 100% spam free. I simply use a blocker       app that blocks everything except my contact list. So I       actually have no spam, nospam... ;)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca