XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android, comp.sys.mac.system
From: arlen.g.holder@arlenholder.net
On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 08:56:40 -0400, nospam wrote:
>> Simple adult question asking whether you comprehend basic facts:
>> o Was almost every iOS device from iOS 10 to iOS 12 vulnerable, or not?
>
> that's not the same as every ios device on the planet.
Hi nospam,
FACTS first... then logical adult assessment.
FACTS:
o Google exposed that Apple advertises the mere illusion of iOS security.
"TAG was able to collect five separate, complete and unique iPhone
exploit chains, covering almost every version from iOS 10 through to the
latest version of iOS 12."
Apple does not (& can not) dispute ANY of the facts of the vulnerabilities!
o Nor that Google proved Apple does not test iOS diarrhea sufficiently!
"Also missing from Apple's statement is any response to the blistering
criticism the Project Zero report made of Apple˘s development process,
which the report alleges missed vulnerabilities that in many cases should
have been easy to catch with standard quality-assurance processes."
What Apple is doing, is what Apple does best - which is that they are
(admittedly cleverly) trying to blame Google using silly semantic issues,
when the fundamental problem is that Apple did not test iOS releases
sufficiently.
What Apple is doing is clear to _adults_, nospam:
o Apple is saying "It happened - but it wasn't bad. Move along".
And yet, almost every iOS 10 to 12 device on the planet, was vulnerable.
o Simply because Apple (yet again, as always), didn't test iOS sufficiently.
There's a _reason_ I call it the iOS diarrhea, nospam.
o Apple customers _feel_ safe simply from the fact of frequent releases.
Apple is happy to provide a diarrhea of releases that makes them feel safe.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
