XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android, comp.sys.mac.system   
   From: arlen.g.holder@arlenholder.net   
      
   On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 09:46:07 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
      
   > e factually logical adult assessment below that:   
   >> o *Apple phones are _more risky_ than Android phones*   
   >   
   > That is an assertion unsupported by any fact you've ever presented.   
      
   Hi Alan Baker,   
      
   Adults can do two things:   
   a. They can comprehend basic facts, and,   
   b. Adults can form logical assessments of those basic facts.   
      
   Apologists habitually brazenly deny facts and logical assessments   
   o Sans a single fact to back up their imaginary belief systems.   
      
   As an adult, I pointed you to a cite utilizing that logical assessment   
   o Proving, yet again, apologists, like flat earthers, are immune to facts   
      
   Google themselves said, and Apple did NOT dispute:   
      "The root causes I highlight here are not novel and are often   
   overlooked: we'll see cases of [Apple] code which seems to have never   
   worked, [Apple] code that likely skipped QA or likely had little testing   
   or review before being shipped to [iOS] users.'"   
      
      
   Notice Google proved Apple iOS is, essentially, a diarrhea of untested   
   releases, which is something I've been proving for years on this ng with   
   well-cited facts - and which you apologists have no facts to refute.   
      
   In addition, notice I've always logically concluded that iOS is no safer   
   than Android, and, in many cases, far less safe than Android, which we   
   proved using well-cited facts long ago on this thread, Alan Baker:   
   o What is the factual truth about PRIVACY differences or similarities between   
   the Android & iOS mobile phone ecosystems?   
      
      
   Notice that other logical adults assess the facts similarly:   
     "It has been pretty clear, from government-sponsored attacks, that   
   iPhones are as vulnerable as any other smartphone, and that they may   
   actually be more risky, due to giving users the impression that the   
   handsets are safer than they actually are, and by making it more difficult   
   to detect infections, as malware-scanning software is impossible to   
   install."   
      
      
   The cites clearly indicate the following valid logical assessment of fact   
   o Google proved Apple iOS code is essentially untested for vulnerabilities   
   o Apple does not dispute ANY of the salient facts in the Google expose   
   o Apple iOS is no safer than Android - and - in many cases - far worse.   
   o Apple advertises trust - but doesn't actually deliver it - it's imaginary   
      
   Admittedly, Apple is brilliant at selling purely imaginary functionality.   
   o What is the most brilliant marketing move Apple ever made?   
      
      
   Which is why you apologists, who gravitate to Apple's messaging   
   o Own imaginary belief systems which are instantly destroyed by facts   
      
   --   
   Note that my facts & assessments are supported by cites while the   
   apologists brazenly deny all facts and assessments, sans a single cite.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)