XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.sys.mac.system   
   From: nunya@ness.biz   
      
   On 2019-09-25 10:05 p.m., Arlen Holder wrote:   
   > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:36:11 +0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote:   
   >   
   >> I have an iPhone 7.  Peak Performance Capability is normal.  The   
   >> battery maximum capacity is 100%.  Doesn't look like anything is   
   >> throttled.   
   >>   
   >> It helps that I had the battery replaced six months or so ago.   
   >> Considering the phone was free I think it's been a good value so far.   
   >   
   > Hi badgolferman,   
   >   
   > I didn't respond to nospam because he proved that the only response the   
   > apologists have to fact or adult discussion - is for the apologist to   
   > always prove they own the brain of a small child.   
   >   
   > I realize you're not an apologist, so I believe I can speak common sense   
   > with you that "about a year" means about a year "on a battery", where, with   
   > the apologists, they endlessly play silly semantic games with the wording.   
   >   
   > The facts are what matter, at least to adults:   
   > 1. Apple installs "throttling software" after "about a year" for iPhones   
      
   That is false.   
      
   > 2. Apple actually throttles the phones, after "about a year" of battery use   
      
   As is this.   
      
   >   
   > That's not a hard and fast rule, in so much that even Apple will claim:   
   > o "throttling software isn't _as_ necessary" on the newer iPhone variants   
   >   
   > But the MAIN ADULT TAKEAWAY from this thread is the PREDICTION that   
   > o Apple will add throttling software for the iPhone XR, Max, & XS (soon).   
      
   Nope. Batteries will age and if they run down too low, the software that   
   is already installed will throttle the CPU.   
      
   >   
   > Bearing in mind most (if not all) my predictions have come to fruition,   
   > o My credibility on comprehension of facts, you have to admit, is 100%   
      
   Nope. He doesn't. Because it isn't.   
      
   >   
   > For example, just look at the idiocy apologists spewed about Qualcomm   
   > o Apple literally gave away their shirt, to settle with them   
      
   No, they did not.   
      
   > o Where the apologists insisted that Apple "wasn't worried".   
   >   
   > Another example is the fact that iOS is an untested scheduled release   
      
   Also false.   
      
   > o Where MANY FACTS prove Apple cares far more about schedule   
   > o Than about quality, security, or privacy   
      
   Assertions: not facts.   
      
   > HINT: Google proved iOS was untested for YEARS, which Apple couldn't deny.   
      
   Nope. Google didn't prove anything of the kind.   
      
   > WORSE: I've been proving that for years - with simple facts.   
   > Which only the apologists attempt to brazenly deny.   
   >   
   > Simply mark my words that I can COMPREHEND the facts   
   > o Such as the fact Tim Cook said that he was going to try to "hide" the   
   > price of the iPhone from the customers ...   
      
   Quote and cite please.   
      
   > And then I can predict the future based on the prior actions of Apple.   
   >   
   > Mark my words:   
   > o I predict Apple will add throttling software to the iPhone XS, Max, & XR   
      
   And you're already wrong.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)