XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.ipad, comp.sys.mac.system   
   From: arlen_h0ldr@arlinghlder.edu   
      
   On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 19:10:48 -0400, nospam wrote:   
      
   >> GOOD STUFF   
   >> o Excellent camera   
   >   
   > so much for your dxo tests.   
      
   Hi nospam,   
      
   I'm going to again try to discus "TheVerge" report as if you're an adult.   
      
   At the risk of stating the obvious, nospam (which even you often dispute)   
   o That's a "two-word" summary.   
      
   What do you think is a "2-word" summary of the top 10 Android cameras?   
   o Let me guess.... um ... er ... how about "excellent camera"!   
      
   The fact is, they're ALL "excellent cameras" at the top ten, nospam.   
   o They just are.   
      
   I realize I'm speaking to you as if you comprehend an adult observation   
   o But a two-word summary of "excellent camera" applies to LOTS of cameras.   
      
   Yet, if you look at historical DXOMark summary scores, the top ten today   
   are _all_ better than the most astronomically priced iPhone yet tested.   
      
   FACTS: Summary scores of extensive detailed camera tests 9/18/2019:   
   o 1 Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G 117   
   o 2 Huawei P30 Pro 116   
   o 3 Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 116   
   o 4 Honor 20 Pro 113   
   o 5 Huawei Mate 20 Pro 112   
   o 6 OnePlus 7 Pro 111   
   o 7 jXiaomi Mi 9 110   
   o 8 Huawei P20 Pro 109   
   o 9 Samsung Galaxy S10+ 109   
   o 10 Apple iPhone XS Max 106  <== Apple is historically on the bottom   
      
   FACTS: Summary scores of extensive detailed camera tests 9/28/2019:   
      
   TOP TEN:   
   [1] Huawei Mate 30 Pro (121)   
   [2] Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (117)   
   [3] Huawei P30 Pro (116)   
   [4] Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (116)   
   [5] Honor 20 Pro (113)   
   [6] Huawei Mate 20 Pro (112)   
   [7] OnePlus 7 Pro (111)   
   [8] Xiaomi Mi 9 (110)   
   [9] Huawei P20 Pro (109)   
   [10] Samsung Galaxy S10+ (109)   
      
   ALL THE REST:   
   [11] Apple iPhone XS Max (106)   
   [12] HTC U12+ (103)   
   [13] Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (103)   
   [14] Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 (103)   
   [15] Google Pixel 3 (102)   
   [16] Apple iPhone XR (101)   
   [17] Google Pixel 3a (100)   
   [18] LG G8 ThinQ (99)   
   [19] Samsung Galaxy S9+ (99)   
   [20] Xiaomi Mi 8 (99)   
   [21] Google Pixel 2 (98)   
   [22] OnePlus 6T (98)   
   [23] Apple iPhone X (97)   
   [24] Huawei Mate 10 Pro (97)   
   [25] Lenovo Z6 Pro (97)   
   [26] OnePlus 6 (96)   
   [27] Apple iPhone 8 Plus (94)   
   [28] LG V40 ThinQ (94)   
   [29] Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (94)   
   [30] Sony Xperia 1 (94)   
   [31] Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (91)   
   [32] Asus ZenFone 5 (90)   
   [33] General Mobile GM9 Pro (90)   
   [34] Google Pixel (90)   
   [35] HTC U11 (90)   
   [36] Vivo X20 Plus (90)   
   [37] Xiaomi Mi Note 3 (90)   
   [38] Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (89)   
   [39] Apple iPhone 7 Plus (88)   
   [40] Samsung Galaxy A9 (86)   
   [41] Crosscall Trekker-X4 (85)   
   [42] Nokia 9 PureView (85)   
   [43] LG G7 ThinQ (83)   
   [44] Samsung Galaxy A50 (83)   
   [45] LG V30 (82)   
   [46] Motorola Moto Z2 Force (82)   
   [47] Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge (82)   
   [48] Motorola Moto G7 Plus (80)   
   [49] Apple iPhone 6 (73)   
   [50] Google Nexus 6P (73)   
   [51] Meizu Pro 7 Plus (71)   
   [52] Lava Z25 (70)   
   [53] Samsung Galaxy S5 (70)   
   [54] Motorola Moto G5S (69)   
   [55] Apple iPhone 5s (68)   
   [56] Nokia 8 (68)   
   [57] Samsung Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) (65)   
      
   You don't like facts nospam - but that doesn't change the fact they're facts.   
      
   Why don't you like facts, nospam?   
   o I think it's perhaps because facts conflict with what Apple marketing told   
   you.   
      
   --   
   o Why do apologists on this ng consistently hate facts about Apple products   
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)