XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.ipad, comp.sys.mac.system   
   From: nunya@ness.biz   
      
   On 2019-09-28 10:45 p.m., Arlen Holder wrote:   
   > On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 20:53:47 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   >   
   >> Which don't include the new iPhones...   
   >   
   > Hi Alan Baker,   
   >   
   > I'm going to try to discuss that fact with you Alan Baker   
   > o As if you own the most basic of comprehensive skills of an adult. OK?   
   >   
   > Did anyone even once say the latest phones were in the DXOMark review?   
   > o HINT: It takes time, expertise, & lots of test equipment for those tests.   
   >   
   > As a news article, TheVerge is fine, as magazines go, but I'm not sure you   
   > noticed that TheVerge did not do a comprehensive test review comparing the   
   > camera quality of output to all the major smartphones (at least fifty of   
   > them, Alan Baker - maybe over a hundred - are tested at DXOMark - all   
   > tested consistently - apples to apples - for the same things using the same   
   > equipment and requiring expertise that TheVerge likely just doesn't have).   
      
   I see.   
      
   So basically when they say something GOOD about an iPhone: you ignore it.   
      
   >   
   > Assuming you own an adult mind, not only did TheVerge NOT do a   
   > comprehensive review comparing to the top 50 to 100 smartphones, but   
   > TheVerge doesn't normally DO comprehensive reviews comparing the top 50 to   
   > 100 smartphones against the same metrics for each phone.   
      
   What they DID do is give their overall opinion of the new iPhones...   
      
   ...and it was very positive.   
      
   Rated them 9/10.   
      
   >   
   > It's sad, but I don't think yet another adult observation is in your grasp,   
   > which is that historically, the most horifficially expensive Apple iPhones   
   > fare in the BOTTOM of the top ten (at best), on average, as they do now,   
   > where, momentarily, at release, the most astronomically expensive iPhone   
   > model temporarily holds a place in the top five, historically.   
   >   
   > I realize these adult observations require you to own an adult level of   
   > comprehension, where I hope that you can strive to comprehend the adult   
   > concepts I just outlined for you - since they're OBVIOUS to all adults.   
   >   
   > In short, it's clear that you are NOT AWARE that iPhones are HISTORICALLY   
   > in the bottom of the top ten in camera QOR in comprehensive   
   > apples-to-apples tests of the top fifty or so mobile phones.   
      
   They're at the bottom when you cherry-pick the timing, you mean.   
      
   And where you arbitrarily decide that being at the bottom of the top ten   
   is somehow relevant.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)