XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.ipad, comp.sys.mac.system   
   From: arlen_h0ldr@arlinghlder.edu   
      
   On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 20:07:54 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
      
   > Did you note the large "9" score they gave the iPhone, "Arlen"?   
      
   Hi Alan Baker,   
      
   I'm going to attempt to reason with you as an adult would.   
   o By using a well known very similar example to Apple camera QOR   
      
   Example:   
   o Exxon markets "premium" fuel & Chevron markets "techron", right?   
   o They "claim" all sorts of "performance" benefits, right?   
      
   And yet, they're completely imaginary.   
   o They lied (essentially)   
      
   Fact is, there are ZERO reliable cites that back up what people think   
   o Premium fuel can't possibly benefit a normal car in working order   
   o Polyetheramines (aka, Techron) are in all top tier fuel (e.g, Costco)   
      
   Notice the dynamic I'm attempting to explain to you:   
   o Exxon & Chevron spend millions of dollars to cleverly market to fools   
   o Who pay more - for what turns out to be wholly imaginary functionality   
      
   There's not a single reliable cite on this planet   
   o Who could claim that premium is "better" for normal cars in working order   
   o Who could claim Techron is anything other than normal polyetheramines   
      
   I observe that this same concept of marketing to fools   
   o Is what Apple does with respect to camera quality of output   
      
   There's not a single reliable comprehensive test site on this planet   
   o Which consistently puts Apple at the top of camera quality of results   
      
   Not a single one.   
   o I know that - and nospam knows that - but do YOU know that?   
      
   --   
   I hope I didn't waste my energy trying to reason with you as an adult.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)