XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, uk.telecom.mobile   
   From: arlen.george.holder@is.invalid   
      
   On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:37:10 -0800, Alan Baker wrote:   
      
   > Why aren't you competent enough to link to the specific post, Liar?   
      
   Hi Alan Baker,   
      
   I'm going to answer your query as if you own the brain of an adult.   
      
   FACTS.   
   o *Checkm8 is damn severe & yet, apologists are oblivious to that fact.*   
   ASSESSMENT.   
   o *Yet again, apologists prove to not own adult cognitive capabilities.*   
      
   Of the score of apologists, the fact is that 1/4 proved to NOT own adult   
   comprehensive skills in that thread, whether you like that fact or not.   
   o *Apologists (yet again) prove to be utterly _immune_ to facts, and,*   
   o *Apologists (yet again) prove to form wholly imaginary belief systems.*   
      
   The facts clearly prove that _adult_ assessment...   
   o Apologists prove, time & again, to own the cognitive skills of a child.   
      
   Below are the exact posts from each of the five aforementioned apologists.   
   o Show me just once where they showed "normal" adult communication skills.   
      
   These five apologists proved, yet again, to own a child's cognitive skills.   
      
   In order of posting, those five known child-like apologists clearly proved   
   (yet again) to act exactly like children do, in the face of what is   
   clearly, a permanent threat to the security & privacy of iPhones.   
   o Jolly Roger   
   o Lloyd Parsons   
   o nospam   
   o Your Name   
   o Lewis   
      
   In order of posting, here are references proving that simple fact that   
   fully 1/4 of the known Apple Apologists on this newsgroup proved, in that   
   thread, yet again, to not own the cognitive skills of a normal adult.   
   o Jolly Roger   
      
      
   o Lloyd Parsons   
      
      
      
   o nospam   
      
      
      
   o Your Name   
      
      
      
   o Lewis   
      
      
   Clearly, any adult can see each of these apologists, when confronted with   
   facts, chose to act like a child, proving, yet again, apologists are not   
   like normal adults.   
      
   I posit that's why Apologists gravitate to Apple's marketing messaging   
   o Rather than to actual facts which normal adults easily comprehend.   
      
   Prove me wrong, Alan Baker...   
   o Not only do I speak adult facts; but I back up my adult facts with cites.   
      
   Show the adults on this newsgroup where, even once, in that thread, those   
   five apologists did NOT post as that of a child?   
   o Show us just once.   
      
   --   
   Bringing TRUTH to the Apple newsgroups, one factual assessment at a time.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)