Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,024 of 20,339    |
|    danny burstein to All    |
|    batteries, was: Apple lied. Again. [snip    |
|    03 Mar 20 14:47:07    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.apps       XPost: uk.telecom.mobile       From: dannyb@panix.com              [snip]              >> Yes, you can get a decent quality battery+DIY replacement kit for half       >> or less what Apple would charge. But for newer phones (at least newer       >> than X, maybe some older ones too?), they're authenticating the       >> battery in such a way that only they or an authorized repair facility       >> can set the authentication for the replacement, even if it's an Apple       >> battery. It'll work and not throttle, but settings won't show the       >> health data, just warn that you have an unverified battery.              >that's because they can't guarantee that it's a genuine battery.              >a lot of off-brand batteries lie about their capacity and there are       >even some that pretend to be genuine which are not.              >the intent is to make sure that the user is getting a genuine and       >quality battery which provides accurate data.              >any battery will obviously work, it just won't report some data unless       >it's validated. not a big deal.              I've run into a related battery problem with a decade old Macbook.              I just replaced the battery with a noname.              It works fine, and gives me a couple of hours of run time       (not sure how it compares to the "real" ones, but it's adequate).              HOWEVER, some of the programs (that's you, Firefox) are running       a lot slower.              Why?              I ran some diagnostics and pulled up the logs via Terminal,       and discovered a huge chunk of error messages that were       apparently generated by the operating system trying to       talk to the battery. And these were displaying with       the "previous message repeated 100 times" line.              It looked like it was enough to mess things up.              Afraid I don't have the laptop here so can't quote it       exactly, but when I did a deep Duck search, some other       people suggested it was a battery deal.              Sure enough, when I slapped in my old battery (it still       works, but only for 15 minutes...) those messages vanished.                                   --       _____________________________________________________       Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key        dannyb@panix.com       [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca