XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android
From: nospam@nospam.invalid
In article , JF Mezei
wrote:
> > nope. everything is lte now, which t-mobile and sprint fully support
> > and have for years, although different bands.
>
> Supporting LTE is one thing. Supporting VoLTE is anther.
they support both and have for years.
stop making up shit.
> Many LTE phones
> don't have VolTE or support for VoLTE on T-Mo/Sprint.
nonsense. nearly everything in the past 5 years supports volte.
stop making up shit.
> (think older phones, alnd also embeded devices).
embedded devices aren't used for calls.
> Remember that Sprint has a lot of MVNOs that target the low end.
not really, but so what? they'll buy a refurb iphone or android phone.
> A handset that doesn't have LTE bands for T-Mo, Sprint and Verizon is
> not likely t also have supported VoLTE.
complete nonsense.
stop making up shit.
> Of those that have VoLTE supported on the new T-Mo network, they likely
> have all the bands needed to opperated on T-Mo/Sprint as well as AT&T or
> Verizon.
recent iphones have all lte bands. some android phones do, but most
have a subset, sometimes only one carrier.
> > nonsense. nobody needs to shop around for lte. why do you make up such
> > shit??
>
> The combined T-Mo and Sprint networks will still have a smaller footprnt
> compared to either At&T and Verizon. So will T-Mo still have a need to
> be able to roam onto the larger network?
not only do you not answer the question but you make up even more shit.
> > there is no roaming revenue.
>
> Ar you kidding me? AT&T or Verizon allowing T-Mo to roam on their
> network brings in lots of cash. But it is a marketing issue because
> their advantage of having better coverage is less marked.
you snipped to alter context again.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
