Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,197 of 20,339    |
|    Wade Garrett to All    |
|    Re: Maps to Compare AT&T, T-Mobile, US C    |
|    06 Oct 21 07:27:00    |
      XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android       From: Wade@cooler.net              On 10/5/21 8:58 PM, YK wrote:       > On 10/6/2021 1:24 PM, nospam wrote:       >>> Giving up significant geographic coverage in order to gain a small       >>> speed increase is not something that a lot of people would be willing       >>> to accept.       >>       >> there is no need to give up 'significant geographic coverage' when       >> using t-mobile, or at&t for that matter.       >       > Don't know about coverage but Verizon lost almost everywhere in speed.              Yeah, it's really annoying having to wait that extra quarter or       half-second for a complex page to load on Verizon. A real loser, they       are ;-)              --       As much as Pooh missed Piglet, he really did enjoy that pulled pork       sandwich.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca