XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com   
      
   Robin Goodfellow wrote:   
      
   >nospam  asked   
   >> same for at&t and verizon. coverage in the santa cruz mountains is   
   >>very  spotty, no matter what carrier.   
   >   
   >I agree with nospam and I live in the Santa Cruz Mountains so I'd   
   >know.  I have no reason to shill for any carrier, whether Verizon,   
   >AT&T, or T-Mo.   
   >   
   >Up here, there isn't even cable so we get even our Wi-Fi from miles   
   >away.   
   >   
   >While Snit and Jolly Roger don't know the difference between megabits   
   >per second versus decibels, I do, where these are my numbers on   
   >T-Mobile.   
   >   
   >With my in-home cellular towers and in-home cellular repeater turned   
   >off...   
   >   
   >My speed is 100 Mbps to 300 Mpbs on T-Mobile in the Santa Cruz   
   >Mountains.      
   >   
   >My signal Strength is -90 to -100 decibels (RSRP) in the same   
   >mountains.      
   >   
   >What's important to note is that a lot of my neighbors are on AT&T and   
   >Verizon in addition to T-Mobile where all have in-home cellular   
   >towers.   
   >   
   >More to the point, we know exactly where the cellular towers are (they   
   >don't hide them you know) where the closest ones are all clustered   
   >together.   
   >   
   >What sms is claiming doesn't make sense and I live in those SC   
   >Mountains.   
   >   
   >How does Verizon "magically" get signal without any nearby towers   
   >doing it?  From a satellite?   
      
      
   I don't think sms cares what your T-Mobile 5G signal looks like because   
   it's not Verizon LTE.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)