home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.cellular      Devices for productivity & masturbation      20,339 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,243 of 20,339   
   sms to badgolferman   
   Re: 5G map   
   05 Apr 22 11:24:52   
   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: scharf.steven@geemail.com   
      
   On 4/5/2022 10:33 AM, badgolferman wrote:   
      
   > It’s nice to see Arlen, nospam, Lewis agreeing on something for once. It   
   > took sms to make this possible!   
      
   “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” ― Napoleon   
   Bonaparte   
      
   It's great to have three trolls all lying at the same time and being   
   unable to dispute any referenced facts!   
      
   Arlen/Andy Burnelli/Dean Hoffman/whatever/ is wrong of course™.   
      
   I never claimed that the FCC maps showed 5G coverage. What I did say is   
   that 5G coverage is virtually always a subset of 4G coverage, at least   
   for mobile phones. 5G equipment is added to existing 4G cells to provide   
   more capacity and higher speeds. The exception are mmWave 5G cells used   
   to provide home broadband service.   
      
   I also pointed out the the Whistleout coverage map included the   
   capability to show 5G only, 4G only, and 5G + 4G coverage, which is very   
   useful if you want to see the difference between 4G and 5G coverage.   
      
   You can see one example of the difference in 5G and 4G service at   
   . You can see that 5G coverage is a   
   subset of 4G coverage.   
      
   It's unclear what prompts Arlen/Andy Burnelli/Dean Hoffman/whatever/ to   
   misstate the facts. It's likely that the cause is the marketing campaign   
   by one carrier that correctly claims that they have more 5G coverage   
   than their competitors. But what that carrier leaves out is that their   
   _total_ coverage, is far less, and for most users what matters most is   
   total coverage, not the difference between 200 Mb/s 4G and 400 Mb/s 5G,   
   even if they're using home broadband service from their carrier.   
   Arlen/Andy Burnelli/Dean Hoffman/whatever/ likely feels bad about making   
   a poor purchasing decision, and rather than helping others to avoid the   
   same mistake, he wants others to follow him down the wrong path.   
      
   A 2021 PC Magazine article   
    summed it up   
   well: "And if you’re out in the countryside and don’t often head to the   
   city, T-Mobile might not be the best carrier for you. The carrier is   
   doing great in the nation’s biggest metro areas, but when we look at   
   small cities and areas away from interstate highways, especially in the   
   western US, it's clear that T-Mobile has to do more work to get better   
   coverage."   
      
   You can see a comparison of nationwide 4G+5G at   
   . But it's also helpful to zoom into   
   the areas that you're most interested in. You can see a compendium of   
   4G+5G coverage comparisons for areas I’ve experienced at   
   .   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca