Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,333 of 20,339    |
|    Marion to All    |
|    Just facts - from EPREL on overall mobil    |
|    04 Jul 25 18:05:30    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile       From: marion@facts.com              Thank God for the EU (& the UK) for forcing OEMs to truthfully report their       mobile device performance (including the UK's battery life requirements).              As of June 20, 2025, all OEMs selling mobile devices in the EU have to       formally report standard benchmarks where all the OEMs used the same       official testing 3rd parties & where all the OEMs knew the standards years       ahead of time, such that EPREL is a wealth of benchmark data where all the       tests were run similarly on all devices.              IMHO, the EPREL is truly the Holy Grail of benchmarks.       (too bad no USA-specific models were included)              Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669        Enter "Google" in the "Brand or trademark" field.        Battery endurance per cycle        GUR25 49h 12min        GEC77 50h 44min        G6GPR 40h 06min        GZC4K 49h 30min        GTF7P 52h 19min              Google Battery Endurance Summary        Original decimal average:        Total = 241.85 hours, Average over 5 models = 48.37 hours               Rounded to nearest whole hour (Apple-style):        Values: 49, 51, 40, 50, 52 ? Total = 242 ? Average = 48.4 hours               Truncated to whole hour (Apple-style):        Values: 49, 50, 40, 49, 52 ? Total = 240 ? Average = 48.0 hours              Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669        Enter "Samsung" in the "Brand or trademark" field.        Battery endurance per cycle        SM-S937B/DS 40h 05min        SM-X210R 98h 32min        SM-X216R 55h 14min        SM-G766B 38h 15min        SM-X350 142h 50min        SM-X356B 142h 50min        SM-X526E 96h 32min        SM-X620 99h 06min        SM-X520 96h 32min        SM-X626B 99h 06min        SM-X526B 96h 32min        SM-A266B/DS 37h 05min        SM-A566B/DS 44h 34min        SM-A366B/DS 41h 28min        SM-S936B/DS 43h 38min        SM-S938B/DS 44h 54min        SM-A165F/DSB 45h 10min        SM-A166B/DS 43h 30min        SM-X820 73h 44min        SM-X920 85h 18min        SM-X826B 73h 44min        SM-X926B 85h 18min        SM-S721B/DS 42h 00min        SM-G556B 41h 22min        SM-S921B/DS 41h 26min        SM-X300 62h 31min        SM-X306B 62h 31min               Total hours: 2,056.96        Average = Total / 28 models = 2,056.96 / 28 = 73.46 hours              Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669        Enter "Apple" in the "Brand or trademark" field.        A3267 62h 00min        A3268 72h 00min        A3355 67h 00min        A3269 72h 00min        A3354 67h 00min        A3266 62h 00min        A3409 41h 00min        A2993 67h 00min        A2995 67h 00min        A3293 37h 00min        A3290 48h 00min        A3296 48h 00min        A3287 37h 00min        A2836 73h 00min        A2837 73h 00min        A2925 77h 00min        A2926 77h 00min        A3090 34h 00min        A3094 45h 00min               Total hours = 1,199.0        Average = 1,199.0 / 19 = 63.1 hours              Note: It makes no difference if you re-calculate all the numbers       Apple-style, which is a truncation apparently, as I ran all the numbers       three ways, namely as is, by rounding, and by truncation. Hence, Apple's       (clever) marketing spin that they reported numbers "lower" than they could       have is meaningless and, worse (much worse) Apple's (brilliant) truncation       cast untoward aspersions on the entire formal process that every OEM,       including Apple, had themselves already long ago been part of.              Overall, Samsung models, based on EPREL data, have a 10 hour advantage.       That's a whopping ~16% higher average battery endurance per cycle.       However, Apple had a decided advantage over Google mobile devices.              I'll send a separate post with a breakdown by smartphones vs tablets.       Especially as Google doesn't have tablets to bring the averages up.              And I'll show the proof that it doesn't matter how you round or truncate       the numbers - they still end up being the same within minor differences.       --       I'm all about facts where I generally don't believe marketing benchmarks.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca