home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.cellular      Devices for productivity & masturbation      20,339 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,333 of 20,339   
   Marion to All   
   Just facts - from EPREL on overall mobil   
   04 Jul 25 18:05:30   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile   
   From: marion@facts.com   
      
   Thank God for the EU (& the UK) for forcing OEMs to truthfully report their   
   mobile device performance (including the UK's battery life requirements).   
      
   As of June 20, 2025, all OEMs selling mobile devices in the EU have to   
   formally report standard benchmarks where all the OEMs used the same   
   official testing 3rd parties & where all the OEMs knew the standards years   
   ahead of time, such that EPREL is a wealth of benchmark data where all the   
   tests were run similarly on all devices.   
      
   IMHO, the EPREL is truly the Holy Grail of benchmarks.   
   (too bad no USA-specific models were included)   
      
   Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669   
    Enter "Google" in the "Brand or trademark" field.   
     Battery endurance per cycle   
      GUR25 49h 12min   
      GEC77 50h 44min   
      G6GPR 40h 06min   
      GZC4K 49h 30min   
      GTF7P 52h 19min   
      
   Google Battery Endurance Summary   
     Original decimal average:   
     Total = 241.85 hours, Average over 5 models = 48.37 hours   
      
     Rounded to nearest whole hour (Apple-style):   
     Values: 49, 51, 40, 50, 52 ? Total = 242 ? Average = 48.4 hours   
      
     Truncated to whole hour (Apple-style):   
     Values: 49, 50, 40, 49, 52 ? Total = 240 ? Average = 48.0 hours   
      
   Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669   
    Enter "Samsung" in the "Brand or trademark" field.   
    Battery endurance per cycle   
     SM-S937B/DS 40h 05min   
     SM-X210R 98h 32min   
     SM-X216R 55h 14min   
     SM-G766B 38h 15min   
     SM-X350 142h 50min   
     SM-X356B 142h 50min   
     SM-X526E 96h 32min   
     SM-X620 99h 06min   
     SM-X520 96h 32min   
     SM-X626B 99h 06min   
     SM-X526B 96h 32min   
     SM-A266B/DS 37h 05min   
     SM-A566B/DS 44h 34min   
     SM-A366B/DS 41h 28min   
     SM-S936B/DS 43h 38min   
     SM-S938B/DS 44h 54min   
     SM-A165F/DSB 45h 10min   
     SM-A166B/DS 43h 30min   
     SM-X820 73h 44min   
     SM-X920 85h 18min   
     SM-X826B 73h 44min   
     SM-X926B 85h 18min   
     SM-S721B/DS 42h 00min   
     SM-G556B 41h 22min   
     SM-S921B/DS 41h 26min   
     SM-X300 62h 31min   
     SM-X306B 62h 31min   
      
     Total hours: 2,056.96   
     Average = Total / 28 models = 2,056.96 / 28 = 73.46 hours   
      
   Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669   
    Enter "Apple" in the "Brand or trademark" field.   
     A3267 62h 00min   
     A3268 72h 00min   
     A3355 67h 00min   
     A3269 72h 00min   
     A3354 67h 00min   
     A3266 62h 00min   
     A3409 41h 00min   
     A2993 67h 00min   
     A2995 67h 00min   
     A3293 37h 00min   
     A3290 48h 00min   
     A3296 48h 00min   
     A3287 37h 00min   
     A2836 73h 00min   
     A2837 73h 00min   
     A2925 77h 00min   
     A2926 77h 00min   
     A3090 34h 00min   
     A3094 45h 00min   
      
     Total hours = 1,199.0   
     Average = 1,199.0 / 19 = 63.1 hours   
      
   Note: It makes no difference if you re-calculate all the numbers   
   Apple-style, which is a truncation apparently, as I ran all the numbers   
   three ways, namely as is, by rounding, and by truncation. Hence, Apple's   
   (clever) marketing spin that they reported numbers "lower" than they could   
   have is meaningless and, worse (much worse) Apple's (brilliant) truncation   
   cast untoward aspersions on the entire formal process that every OEM,   
   including Apple, had themselves already long ago been part of.   
      
   Overall, Samsung models, based on EPREL data, have a 10 hour advantage.   
   That's a whopping ~16% higher average battery endurance per cycle.   
   However, Apple had a decided advantage over Google mobile devices.   
      
   I'll send a separate post with a breakdown by smartphones vs tablets.   
   Especially as Google doesn't have tablets to bring the averages up.   
      
   And I'll show the proof that it doesn't matter how you round or truncate   
   the numbers - they still end up being the same within minor differences.   
   --   
   I'm all about facts where I generally don't believe marketing benchmarks.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca