Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,334 of 20,339    |
|    Marion to Marion    |
|    Re: Just facts - from EPREL on overall m    |
|    04 Jul 25 18:13:39    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile       From: marion@facts.com              On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:05:30 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :                     > I'll send a separate post with a breakdown by smartphones vs tablets.       > Especially as Google doesn't have tablets to bring the averages up.       >       > And I'll show the proof that it doesn't matter how you round or truncate       > the numbers - they still end up being the same within minor differences.              I'm a scientist and an engineer so I especially delve into benchmarks.       In this case, we need to separate the smartphones from the tablets.       Because they're inherently different in that tablets have better batteries.              Brand Comparison (All using Apple-style truncated values):        Samsung Average endurance 73.07 hours (from 28 models)        Apple Average endurance 63.1 hours (from 19 models)        Google Average endurance 48.0 hours (from 5 models)              Breakdown by tablets versus smartphones in the EPREL database:        Apple 16 smartphones, 3 tablets        Samsung 22 smartphones, 6 tablets        Google 5 smartphones, 0 tablets              Quick summary of the math.        Apple smartphones:        Values = 62, 72, 67, 72, 67, 62, 41, 67, 67, 37, 48, 48, 37, 34, 45, 40        Total = 1,070h, Average = 66.9 hours               Apple Tablets:        Values = 73, 73, 77        Total = 223h, Average = 74.3 hours               Samsung Smartphones:        Models with typical identifiers (e.g. SM-A, SM-G, SM-S):        Values = 40, 38, 37, 45, 41, 43, 44, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 41, 44,        38, 43, 44, 37, 41, 42, 41, 41        Total = 906h, Average = 41.2 hours               Samsung Tablets:        Models starting with SM-X:        Values = 98, 55, 142, 142, 96, 99        Total = 632h, Average = 105.3 hours               Google Smartphones only (no tablets):        Values = 49, 50, 40, 49, 52        Total = 240h, Average = 48.0 hours              Summary of averages by brand & type:        Smartphones Apple 66.9h Samsung 41.2h Google 48.0h        Tablets Apple 74.3h Samsung 105.3h Google (none)              Looking at tablets only, Samsung dominates with especially high endurance       numbers over Apple (Google doesn't seem to have tablets sold in the EU).              Looking at smartphones, Apple shows a clear lead over both Samsung and       Google in terms of benchmarked battery endurance cycle performance metrics.       --       I'm all about facts where I generally are wary of marketing benchmarks.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca