Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,336 of 20,339    |
|    Alan to Marion    |
|    Re: Just facts - from EPREL on overall m    |
|    07 Jul 25 18:28:22    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2025-07-04 14:13, Marion wrote:       > On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:05:30 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :       >       >       >> I'll send a separate post with a breakdown by smartphones vs tablets.       >> Especially as Google doesn't have tablets to bring the averages up.       >>       >> And I'll show the proof that it doesn't matter how you round or truncate       >> the numbers - they still end up being the same within minor differences.       >       > I'm a scientist and an engineer so I especially delve into benchmarks.       > In this case, we need to separate the smartphones from the tablets.       > Because they're inherently different in that tablets have better batteries.       >       > Brand Comparison (All using Apple-style truncated values):       > Samsung Average endurance 73.07 hours (from 28 models)       > Apple Average endurance 63.1 hours (from 19 models)       > Google Average endurance 48.0 hours (from 5 models)              What are there average efficiency scores?              >       > Breakdown by tablets versus smartphones in the EPREL database:       > Apple 16 smartphones, 3 tablets       > Samsung 22 smartphones, 6 tablets       > Google 5 smartphones, 0 tablets       >       > Quick summary of the math.       > Apple smartphones:       > Values = 62, 72, 67, 72, 67, 62, 41, 67, 67, 37, 48, 48, 37, 34, 45, 40       > Total = 1,070h, Average = 66.9 hours       >       > Apple Tablets:       > Values = 73, 73, 77       > Total = 223h, Average = 74.3 hours       >       > Samsung Smartphones:       > Models with typical identifiers (e.g. SM-A, SM-G, SM-S):       > Values = 40, 38, 37, 45, 41, 43, 44, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 41, 44,       > 38, 43, 44, 37, 41, 42, 41, 41       > Total = 906h, Average = 41.2 hours       >       > Samsung Tablets:       > Models starting with SM-X:       > Values = 98, 55, 142, 142, 96, 99       > Total = 632h, Average = 105.3 hours       >       > Google Smartphones only (no tablets):       > Values = 49, 50, 40, 49, 52       > Total = 240h, Average = 48.0 hours       >       > Summary of averages by brand & type:       > Smartphones Apple 66.9h Samsung 41.2h Google 48.0h       > Tablets Apple 74.3h Samsung 105.3h Google (none)       >       > Looking at tablets only, Samsung dominates with especially high endurance       > numbers over Apple (Google doesn't seem to have tablets sold in the EU).       >       > Looking at smartphones, Apple shows a clear lead over both Samsung and       > Google in terms of benchmarked battery endurance cycle performance metrics.              Again: no real scientist would compare things this way.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca