home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.cellular      Devices for productivity & masturbation      20,339 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,336 of 20,339   
   Alan to Marion   
   Re: Just facts - from EPREL on overall m   
   07 Jul 25 18:28:22   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2025-07-04 14:13, Marion wrote:   
   > On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 18:05:30 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :   
   >   
   >   
   >> I'll send a separate post with a breakdown by smartphones vs tablets.   
   >> Especially as Google doesn't have tablets to bring the averages up.   
   >>   
   >> And I'll show the proof that it doesn't matter how you round or truncate   
   >> the numbers - they still end up being the same within minor differences.   
   >   
   > I'm a scientist and an engineer so I especially delve into benchmarks.   
   > In this case, we need to separate the smartphones from the tablets.   
   > Because they're inherently different in that tablets have better batteries.   
   >   
   > Brand Comparison (All using Apple-style truncated values):   
   >   Samsung Average endurance 73.07 hours (from 28 models)   
   >   Apple Average endurance 63.1 hours (from 19 models)   
   >   Google Average endurance 48.0 hours (from 5 models)   
      
   What are there average efficiency scores?   
      
   >   
   > Breakdown by tablets versus smartphones in the EPREL database:   
   >   Apple 16 smartphones, 3 tablets   
   >   Samsung 22 smartphones, 6 tablets   
   >   Google 5 smartphones, 0 tablets   
   >   
   > Quick summary of the math.   
   >   Apple smartphones:   
   >   Values = 62, 72, 67, 72, 67, 62, 41, 67, 67, 37, 48, 48, 37, 34, 45, 40   
   >   Total = 1,070h, Average = 66.9 hours   
   >   
   >   Apple Tablets:   
   >   Values = 73, 73, 77   
   >   Total = 223h, Average = 74.3 hours   
   >   
   >   Samsung Smartphones:   
   >   Models with typical identifiers (e.g. SM-A, SM-G, SM-S):   
   >   Values = 40, 38, 37, 45, 41, 43, 44, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 41, 44,   
   >            38, 43, 44, 37, 41, 42, 41, 41   
   >   Total = 906h, Average = 41.2 hours   
   >   
   >   Samsung Tablets:   
   >   Models starting with SM-X:   
   >   Values = 98, 55, 142, 142, 96, 99   
   >   Total = 632h, Average = 105.3 hours   
   >   
   >   Google Smartphones only (no tablets):   
   >   Values = 49, 50, 40, 49, 52   
   >   Total = 240h, Average = 48.0 hours   
   >   
   > Summary of averages by brand & type:   
   >   Smartphones Apple 66.9h Samsung 41.2h Google 48.0h   
   >   Tablets Apple 74.3h Samsung 105.3h Google (none)   
   >   
   > Looking at tablets only, Samsung dominates with especially high endurance   
   > numbers over Apple (Google doesn't seem to have tablets sold in the EU).   
   >   
   > Looking at smartphones, Apple shows a clear lead over both Samsung and   
   > Google in terms of benchmarked battery endurance cycle performance metrics.   
      
   Again: no real scientist would compare things this way.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca