XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics
XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama
XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,
lt.politics.trump
XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse
XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars
XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,
alt.politics.guns, alt.society.liberalism
XPost: alt.atheism
From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov
On 5/5/22 7:57 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 5/4/22 08:58, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 May 2022 06:51:46 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The Constitution protects many more rights than it mentions.
>>>
>>> DAMON ROOT | 5.3.2022 1:36 PM
>>>
>>> The leaked "1st Draft" opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v.
>>> Jackson
>>> Women's Health Organization that was published yesterday by Politico
>>> would, if
>>> officially released by the Court, overturn both Roe v. Wade (1973)
>>> and Planned
>>> Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the key precedents securing a woman's
>>> constitutional
>>> right to terminate a pregnancy.
>>>
>>> The author of the leaked draft opinion, Justice Samuel Alito, makes
>>> the standard
>>> conservative argument against abortion rights. "The Constitution
>>> makes no
>>> reference to abortion," Alito writes, "and no such right is
>>> implicitly protected
>>> by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the
>>> defenders of Roe
>>> and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
>>> Amendment.
>>> That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not
>>> mentioned in
>>> the Constitution, but any such right must be 'deeply rooted in this
>>> Nation's
>>> history and tradition' and 'implicit in the concept of ordered
>>> liberty.'" Alito
>>> continues: "The right to an abortion does not fall within this
>>> category."
>>
>>
>> Of course, he's 100% correct and Rudy, of course, isn't. Rudy hates
>> the Constitution, as he's mentioned several times.
>
> I am a bit confused here. In the past the one thing on which Rudy and I
> have agreed, is that abortion is wrong. It seems that he has reversed
> himself here.
>
Abortion was never a RIGHT, there is NO RIGHT to kill another human
being... there is a right to defend your own life but that has been
established to mean that you have to use the least force available and
necessary to protect your life... It's NOT a RIGHT to kill someone it's
a RIGHT to protect yourself. Abortion is NOT a RIGHT to kill a HUMAN
LIFE as I said above, no such RIGHT exists.
If someone tries to give you a vaccine against your will and inject mRNA
into you can you kill them? If they sold you cigarettes for 20 years and
you're dying of cancer can you kill them? If they got drunk and ran you
over and and you are dying, can you kill them?
Where in the Constitution is there a RIGHT to kill another human life
because you have been harmed for life or for 9 months? Having an mRNA
parasite injected would be a reason to kill someone if it was a RIGHT
that you can kill a human life when you're enduring hardship due to others.
--
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-
*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-
oter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
273 - Democrats have no VISION to help make a MORE PERFECT UNION, all
they have is HATE for America and Americans.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
