XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics
XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama
XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,
lt.politics.trump
XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse
XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars
XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,
alt.politics.guns, talk.politics.guns
XPost: talk.politics.misc
From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov
On 5/7/22 1:43 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 5/6/22 21:00, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Just Wondering wrote in news:gLbdK.5571$tTq1.871@fx34.iad:
>>
>>> On 5/5/2022 7:54 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>> On 5/5/2022 11:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anybody calculated how much larger the nation's electrical
>>>>>>> grid would have to be to power an all-electric vehicle fleet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Every state promoting EV sales has already done that
>>>>>
>>>>> I call Bullshit on that unsupported bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> Explain why every Republican state government is pushing
>>>> EV sales if their grids cannot handle it.
>>>>
>>>> The following state governments are offering incentives and
>>>> rebates to encourage EV sales, THEY seem to think their
>>>> infrastructures can handle them.
>>>>
>>> Only because EV sales are still minuscule. Fewer than 1% of
>>> vehicles on the road, and under 2% of sales, are EV. But what
>>> if those numbers increased by two orders of magnitude, if every
>>> fossil fuel powered vehicle was replaced by EV vehicles?
>>
>>
>> "Who would buy a horseless carriage
>> with gas only availible in hardware stores"?
>>
>> Henry Ford didn't worry about the
>> infrastructure when he flooded the country
>> with cheap cars, and he was right. The roads
>> got built to accomodate them, the gas stations
>> got built to accomodate them.
>
> Henry Ford made what he thought to be a good business decision,
> subsequent events proved him right. You are comparing a buying decision
> on the part of an individual with a business decision made by a
> manufacturer. Surely you can see the difference.
>
> The model T was introduced in 1908, gas stations began to appear in
> 1913. In turn with the increased demand for gasoline, the oil business
> began to grow. All this happened without state incentives to buy
> automobiles. Despite all this, there were almost certainly people who
> held off on buying a car until they were certain that it would meet
> their needs.
According to Democrats, it was wrong for Henry Ford and government to
mandate AUTOMOBILES PURCHASE OR USE... Because they caused GLOBAL
WARMING, so why are Democrats and government trying to re-create that
same type of mistake. And doing it with batteries in EV's that will
cause different damage to the world?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"As more and more people in the United States are waking up to the fact
that our federal health agencies, such as the FDA and CDC, are corrupt
and serve the interests of Wall Street Billionaires and not the public,
it is more important than ever to understand the corruption that also
exists within the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) and their years
of bad nutritional advice that has demonized traditional, healthy fats
and oils that have nourished populations for thousands of years, in
favor of the newer “polyunsaturated” oils which are toxic, and dangerous
to your health.
These polyunsaturated “edible oils” have only been in the human food
chain since the “expeller-pressed” technology was developed during and
following World War II that allowed the U.S. to start producing highly
toxic and refined “edible” oils from corn and soybeans, two crops
heavily subsidized by taxpayers that allows the U.S. to dominate world
edible oil supplies."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
And the point I'm making with the excerpt from an article that I quoted
above, is that the seed oils that humans shouldn't eat, are actually
pretty good replacements for Diesel Fuel... They can run in some cases
a diesel engine without any special processing to make them BIO-DIESEL
so they can go straight from the oil press into the vehicle, things like
Corn oil, Canola, Sunflower and even Camelina sativa oil.
"Camelina has been developed as a crop due to its high oil content
(30-40%), its unique oil properties and its potential to increase the
cropping intensity in certain dryland cropping systems. The oil from
camelina is suitable for a variety of food uses and for biodiesel
production."
Rather than *SWALLOWING* the lies of the FDA/CDC and or *MINISTRY* of
*TRUTH* we can burn them in diesels and use the existing infrastructure
we already have. And these oils would make the cars and trucks *SOLAR*
and *WIND POWERED* because the crop is using sunlight and rain from the
winds... NO Fossil FUEL necessary.
--
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-
*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-
oter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html
*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
205 - If race doesn't matter then why do Democrats blame it for all
their failures? -BMUS-
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
