Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.censorship    |    All matters of censorship in society    |    12,782 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,866 of 12,782    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to DEFUNDPOLICEJOE    |
|    Re: Biden Administration Will Pay Farmer    |
|    14 May 22 15:01:39    |
      XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics       XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama       XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,        lt.politics.trump       XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse       XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars       XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,       alt.politics.guns       From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov              On 5/14/22 1:57 PM, DEFUNDPOLICEJOE wrote:       > The goal is to add 4 million acres of farmland to the Conservation Reserve       Program, which takes land out of production to blunt agriculture’s       environmental impac       >       > The goal is to add 4 million acres of farmland to the Conservation Reserve       Program, which takes land out of production to blunt agriculture’s       environmental impact.       >       > The Biden administration announced on Wednesday that it would expand a       program that pays farmers to leave land fallow, part of a broader,       government-wide effort to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030. The       new initiative will incentivize        farmers to take land out of production by raising rental rates and incentive       payments.       >       > The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) was created in 1985 to incentivize       landowners to leave some of their marginal land unplanted, a plan meant to       protect the environment by reducing agricultural runoff into streams and       rivers, preserving wildlife        habitats, and preventing erosion. Today, the Department of Agriculture (USDA)       “rents” about 21 million acres of farmland from landowners, typically for       10 years at a time—a tiny fraction of the total land farmed nationwide. In       recent years, the        number of acres enrolled in CRP has fallen, possibly because USDA’s rental       payments have not been competitive with the open market, Chuck Abbott reported       for FERN News.       >       > The new announcement is a bid to incentivize farmers to enroll 4 million       more acres of land in the program to total 25 million acres, the current       program limit. “Sometimes the best solutions are right in front of you,”       said Agriculture Secretary        Tom Vilsack in a press release.       >       >       > “A huge amount of money was essentially paid and then lost when those       acres go back into farming.”       >       > All told, the increased rental rates and expanded incentive payments—which       pay farmers extra for growing buffer strips and promoting wildlife       habitats—will increase CRP spending by about 18 percent, totaling $300       million or more in annual spending.       >       > “Overall, we think the changes are good, but also they could still be       better,” said Anne Schechinger, senior economic analyst with the       Environmental Working Group. CRP typically only takes land out of production       for 10 years at a time, and many        farmers opt not to renew after a decade—many of the environmental benefits       are erased as soon as the soil is plowed under and crops are replanted.       Schechinger published a report that found almost 16 million acres were taken       out of the reserve between        2007 and 2014 after landowners opted not to re-rent them to USDA. The       government had spent more than $7 billion to preserve those acres. “A huge       amount of money was essentially paid and then lost when those acres go back       into farming,” Schechinger        said.       >       >       > Asked about this issue in a press call on Thursday, Vilsack was vague.       “The key here is to make sure that we continue to have a commitment to CRP       as one strategy, one of many strategies,” he said. “An acre here may       change, but there may be        additional acres over there that weren’t in a program that are in a program.       Over time you make significant improvement toward a net-zero future.”       >       > So far, there’s been little motion from Vilsack’s office and the       Democrat-controlled Congress on mandatory regulations designed to mitigate       agriculture’s environmental impact.       >       > To be clear, conservation is still a good thing, even if it only lasts for       10 years, Schechinger said. But from a climate perspective, plowing up land       that has lain fallow for a decade will release a lot of the carbon that was       sequestered in the soil.        She’d like to see an expansion of the CLEAR30 pilot program, which rents       land for 30 years at a time and requires farmers to implement water-friendly       conservation measures. Other measures, like slightly higher payments for       acreage that has been kept        out production for one ten-year cycle, could further incentivize long-term       conservation.       >       > To date, the Biden administration has focused on voluntary, incentives-based       programs like CRP to address climate change and the environment in the farming       sector. Other Democrats have favored a less business-friendly approach:       Senator Cory Booker        introduced a moratorium on the construction of new Concentrated Animal Feeding       Operations in 2019, which emit the potent greenhouse gas methane, and Senator       Bernie Sanders championed broader enforcement of the Clean Air and Clean Water       Acts during his        presidential campaign. So far, there’s been little motion from Vilsack’s       office and the Democrat-controlled Congress on mandatory regulations designed       to mitigate agriculture’s environmental impact.       >       > “I really think regulations are the only way we’re going to accomplish       anything,” Schechinger said. “We can keep doing some voluntary—CRP is       good, retiring land is a great thing—but it’s not going to be enough to       get us where we need to        be with mitigating climate change.”       >                     Sounds like an act of TREASON to subvert the food supply by paying       FARMERS to NOT grow food.              More sabotage by the Marxists who are also censoring Americans to hide       the Marxist Cultural Revolution that's being waged against WE THE PEOPLE       by those Marxist who were given Political and Judicial power.              It's time to impeach and prosecute the criminals to the full extent of       the law under the U.S. Constitution.                            --       The only way to fight the STAGFLATION would be to shrink the size and       taxing and spending of the Government combined with raising the interest       rates to their NATURAL self determining rates rather than the FAKE       INTEREST RATES created by the DEMOCRATS under Obama/Biden-2008 and       Biden/Obama-2020....              The problem isn't "the economy stupid", the problem is       *the stupid government manipulated economy* .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       .       -That's karma-              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca