âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@ðŸ�».🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�   
   âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�>   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.survival   
   XPost: misc.survivalism   
   From: 👩ðŸ�½â€   
   âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@ðŸ�».🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�   
      
   governor.swill@gmail.com wrote on 5/29/2022 3:54 PM:   
   >>> >>Treaties and International Laws are subject to our Constitution's   
   >>> >>LIMITATIONS and their constitutionality, NOT the other way around.   
   >> >Your Constitution has no authority over International Laws and Treaties,   
   >> >you babbling idiot.   
   > But it does lay out the procedure for approval of those treaties which   
   > may require other nations to accept American law in some sphere.   
      
   NAFTA is "North American Free Trade Agreement" is a trade agreement.    
   Trade agreements have nothing to do with the Constitution of the United    
   States. The US is known to have made trade agreements with an    
   authoritarian countries like China, oligarchic countries like Russia,    
   and monarchic dictatorships like Saudi Arabia.   
      
   > The Democrats opposed NAFTA.  Clinton ran against it.  But during the   
   > transition, the Bush team persuaded him.  He agreed to support NAFTA   
   > with the added provisions that facilities (farms, factories, etc)   
   > producing goods for export to the US had to conform to US labor,   
   > environmental and health and safety regulations.   
   >   
   > [That is, the treaty required a foreign nation to operate according to   
   > American law.]   
   >   
   > "Before sending it to the United States Senate, Clinton added two side   
   > agreements, the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC)   
   > and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC),   
   > including health and safety regulation to protect workers and the   
   > environment, and to also allay the concerns of many House members. The   
   > U.S. required its partners to adhere to environmental practices and   
   > regulations similar to its own." [citation needed]   
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement#Negotiation   
   >   
   > Citations:   
   > The labor rider:   
   > "Officially called the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation   
   > (NAALC), the labor side accord exists to promote what the signatories   
   > termed their "resolve" to "protect, enhance and enforce basic workers'   
   > rights." Never before had labor rights standards been so explicitly   
   > included in the framework of a trade pact."   
   > https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6a7fe8.html   
   >   
   > The environmental/health and safety rider:   
   > "Environmental concerns were afterthoughts to NAFTA, forced on the   
   > governments by environmental and labor groups. In response, the three   
   > governments wrote sustainable development into NAFTA’s preamble,   
   > strengthened sanitary and phytosanitary (plant health) trade   
   > requirements, and vowed that NAFTA would not drive down the region’s   
   > environmental standards."   
   > https://ips-dc.org/nafta_and_environment/   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)