âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@ðŸ�».🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�   
   âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�>   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.survival   
   XPost: misc.survivalism   
   From: 👩ðŸ�½â€   
   âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@ðŸ�».🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�   
      
   governor.swill@gmail.com wrote on 5/29/2022 3:54 PM:   
   >>> >>And the 2nd Amendment recognized the PEOPLE are the ones with the RIGHT   
   >>> >>to KEEP and bear arms which denied that power to regulate to the States   
   >>> >>and there is no power to regulate or ban or make laws related to the   
   >>> >>RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, that has been delegated to   
   >>> >>the United States government. So the United States government can make   
   >>> >>no law banning guns or sign any treaty banning guns because it would be   
   >>> >>Unconstitutional.   
   >> >   
   >> >The Second Amendment is outdated and thus null-and-void. We requires an   
   >> >amendment to amend the Second Amendment so that only federal and local   
   >> >law enforcement agents can keep and bear arms. Special exceptions may be   
   >> >granted to civilian security guards.   
   > While I understand the logic, I disagree.  The second is an important   
   > component of national defense.  There are nearly 400M guns in this   
   > country and nobody knows where they all are.  So who in their right   
   > mind would invade the United States knowing that at any moment any of   
   > the invaders might find himself on the business end of half a dozen   
   > assorted killing machines?   
      
   Guns were useful in colonial days to subdue the native population, but   
   the colonial days are passe. The US is the last country in the world   
   still living its colonial dream, even after its epic failures in   
   colonizing Vietnam and Afghanistan.   
      
   The US defeated the Germans by firebombing Dresden, and defeated the   
   Japanese by atomic-bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki, not with guns. Today,   
   guns in the hands of the general population serve no purpose in   
   defending the US against foreign invasion. You won't see foreign troops   
   storming beaches or parachuting into cities. WWIII will be fought with   
   missiles, so guns are useless in national defence, but weapon of choice   
   in suicide, road rages, drug deals gone bad, robbery and murder,   
   especially mass shootings.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)