âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@ðŸ�».🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�   
   âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�>   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.survival   
   XPost: misc.survivalism   
   From: 👩ðŸ�½â€   
   âš•ï¸�👨†  
   âš•ï¸�👮👨ðŸ�¿â€   
   ðŸš’👷@ðŸ�».🠠 
   �🎖ï¸�   
      
   KWills wrote on 5/30/2022 9:54 AM:   
   > On Mon, 30 May 2022 08:37:36 -0400, Mighty Wannabe   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> governor.swill@gmail.com wrote on 5/30/2022 7:29 AM:   
   >>> On Mon, 30 May 2022 01:44:20 -0400, Mighty Wannabe wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> governor.swill@gmail.com wrote on 5/29/2022 3:54 PM:   
   >>>>>>>>> Treaties and International Laws are subject to our Constitution's   
   >>>>>>>>> LIMITATIONS and their constitutionality, NOT the other way around.   
   >>>>>>> Your Constitution has no authority over International Laws and   
   Treaties,   
   >>>>>>> you babbling idiot.   
   >>>>> But it does lay out the procedure for approval of those treaties which   
   >>>>> may require other nations to accept American law in some sphere.   
   >>>> NAFTA [,] "North American Free Trade Agreement"[,] is a trade agreement.   
   >>>> Trade agreements have nothing to do with the Constitution of the United   
   >>>> States. The US is known to have made trade agreements with an   
   >>>> authoritarian countries like China, oligarchic countries like Russia,   
   >>>> and monarchic dictatorships like Saudi Arabia.   
   >>> Did not treaties and war settlements following WWII require conquered   
   >>> nations to form republics, allow free speech and require the rule of   
   >>> law?   
   >> You are wrong again. There is no such thing. Only happens in your dream.   
   >> Japan is still a monarchy, not a republic.   
   >       It's an empire. The emperor is subject to Japan's Constitution.   
   > Much like Queen Elizabeth is subject to England's Constitution.   
   >   
   >> The Japanese war criminal   
   >> emperor abdicated in 2019 and passed the throne to his son.   
   >       Emperor Showa (aka Hirohito) remained Emperor until he died in   
   > 1989. Akihito succeeded the position after his fathers death. He   
   > abdicated in 2019, 30 years after his father died.   
   >   
      
   So the one abdicated in 2019 wasn't the war criminal from WWII. Thanks   
   for pointing that out.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)