home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,970 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to -hh   
   Re: Elementary School Killer Used Bullet   
   04 Jun 22 09:47:25   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 6/3/22 6:07 PM, -hh wrote:   
   > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 3:03:32 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >> -hh wrote:   
   >>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 9:10:47 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:00:11 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 12:39:00 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 12:46:45 AM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:56:39 -0400, Blue Lives Matter   
   >>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 2:08:48 PM UTC-5, Blue Lives Matter   
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 May 2022 11:53:27 -0700, Mattb    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> …   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still merely your opinion. Not much else you can do.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. If cancel culture tries their shit on my property might need   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to call them some EMTs.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Premeditated violence… worth noting for the civil lawsuits, if   
   you ever   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> have the balls to follow-through. Quite stupid of you to announce   
   intent.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I live in the middle of 43 acres on fenced and gated land. They   
   >>>>>>>>>> have no right to enter. I can't see the gate from the house, but   
   >>>>>>>>>> there is only about 4 feet of public property near the gate and the   
   >>>>>>>>>> highway is dangerous. OK if they are hit by a car I won't call the   
   >>>>>>>>>> … EMTs.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Nope, won’t fly because proportionally principle applies.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> FYI, this is something that every US service person has had   
   >>>>>>>>> to learn … and is an easy way to spot poseurs...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> LOL. Sorry, you, being a liberal progressive, might not believe   
   >>>>>>>> this but if a mob enters my property and they are agitated and   
   >>>>>>>> violent, a person does indeed have the right to defend themselves,   
   >>>>>>>> family and property. Just because a person is a liberal doesn't give   
   >>>>>>>> them special rights. Now I might enjoy it if one of them tried to   
   >>>>>>>> climb the gate slip and become an Eunuch, thereby preserving the gene   
   >>>>>>>> pull.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Oh, so now it’s an “agitated mob”? That’s a huge goalpost move   
   from what   
   >>>>>>> you claimed before, namely that any trespasser more than a few feet   
   off the   
   >>>>>>> highway was going to be shot, no matter what.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I never used the words "any trespasser".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yeah, you pretty much did:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> OH I "pretty much did". LOL   
   >>>   
   >>> Because you implied, but did not literally say ‘shoot first, ask   
   questions later’.   
   >>   
   >> Let us see if my original comment was "OK. If cancel culture tries   
   >> their shit on my property might need to call them some EMTs". From   
   >> that, you have said I said I was going to shoot all trespassers, shoot   
   >> first, ask questions later, …   
   >   
   > Considering that the ‘cancel culture’ pretty much limits themselves   
   > to a strongly worded letter to the editor, your comment made it clear   
   > that your intent was to perform violence on them.   
   >   
   >> …that I said I'd use an AR-15 …   
   >   
   > But as a club:  you really do not comprehend satire.   
   >   
   >   
   >> Are you a member of Antifa?   
   >   
   > Are you asking as a nazi fascist, or merely as a supporter of nazi fascists?   
   >   
   >   
   >>  You'd have to define what was meant in the words "tried their   
   >> shit".   
   >   
   > Already done, because you chose to not do so.   
   >   
   >> It was already limited to on my property.   
   >   
   > Which was left vague…conveniently, again.   
   >   
   >> You should go work for Rush limbaugh as you are a spin expert.   
   >   
   > You need more experience with IRL legal documents/contracts.   
   >   
   >>>>>>> …and that by now running as fast as you can away from your own   
   bravado claim,   
   >>>>>>> you’re not just a liar, but nothing more than a craven coward too.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No if a mob …   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You mean, the “mob” that you added after the fact?   
   >>>>> And of course you’re claiming that they’re violent too?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They would have to be.   
   >>>   
   >>> It is still a change from your originally claimed condition.   
   >>> Congratulations on your backpedaling.   
   >>   
   >> My original condition was " tried their shit on my property". No   
   >> back pedaling.   
   >   
   > Which was not defined… conveniently .. as well as written so that   
   > even one kid putting a flier into a mailbox qualified as a “threat”   
   > in the way that you wrote it up.  Premeditated violence on him.   
   >   
   >  > I believe you want me to make a direct threat. WHY?   
   >   
   > No need, as you’ve already expressed your intent, in a public forum,   
   > which makes it legally discoverable.   
   >   
   >>>>> This is a gun thread and your braggadocio was to do something to them   
   >>>>> for which they’d need EMT’s.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If they tried to climb the gate and slipped they would need a EMT.   
   >>>   
   >>> Is this a fence climbing thread? No, it’s a gun thread.   
   >>   
   >> To bad you going to Cancel me ROFL.   
   >   
   > No need: you’ve done it to yourself.   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>>> If they get in the way of traffic on the highway …   
   >>>   
   >>> Is this a traffic safety thread? No, it’s a gun thread.   
   >>   
   >> It is whatever I decide to post thread. You going to cancel me ROFL   
   >   
   > No need: you’ve done it to yourself.   
   >   
   >>>> If you attacked me you'd need a EMT.   
   >>>   
   >>> I’m attacking you now verbally, so why are you threatening violence?   
   >>   
   >> No, you are not a threat, and what you call an attack is just you   
   >> lying and spinning for your agenda. You are a joke. Progressives are   
   >> mostly wimps and whiners.   
   >   
   > On the contrary: by revealing your intent, and in a discoverable fashion,   
   > you’ve just opened yourself to a huge amount of liability if anything ever   
   > happens on your property… even if it wasn’t conducted personally by you.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>>> BTW this is "alt.fan.rush-limbaugh" not a gun group. More about   
   >>>> politics.   
   >>>   
   >>> It’s still a gun thread.   
   >>   
   >> It is actually about ammunition more than the gun.   
   >   
   > Well, if you’re going to *try* to be pedantic, then you’ll need to   
   > explain to us how bullet composition selection is then apparently   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca