XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 6/4/22 10:10 AM, -hh wrote:   
   > On Saturday, June 4, 2022 at 8:47:31 AM UTC-5, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >> On 6/3/22 6:07 PM, -hh wrote:   
   >>> On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 3:03:32 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 9:10:47 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:00:11 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 12:39:00 PM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 12:46:45 AM UTC-5, Mattb wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:56:39 -0400, Blue Lives Matter   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 2:08:48 PM UTC-5, Blue Lives Matter   
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 May 2022 11:53:27 -0700, Mattb    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> …   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still merely your opinion. Not much else you can do.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. If cancel culture tries their shit on my property might   
   need   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to call them some EMTs.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Premeditated violence… worth noting for the civil lawsuits,   
   if you ever   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have the balls to follow-through. Quite stupid of you to   
   announce intent.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I live in the middle of 43 acres on fenced and gated land. They   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> have no right to enter. I can't see the gate from the house, but   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> there is only about 4 feet of public property near the gate and   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> highway is dangerous. OK if they are hit by a car I won't call the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> … EMTs.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Nope, won’t fly because proportionally principle applies.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> FYI, this is something that every US service person has had   
   >>>>>>>>>>> to learn … and is an easy way to spot poseurs...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> LOL. Sorry, you, being a liberal progressive, might not believe   
   >>>>>>>>>> this but if a mob enters my property and they are agitated and   
   >>>>>>>>>> violent, a person does indeed have the right to defend themselves,   
   >>>>>>>>>> family and property. Just because a person is a liberal doesn't give   
   >>>>>>>>>> them special rights. Now I might enjoy it if one of them tried to   
   >>>>>>>>>> climb the gate slip and become an Eunuch, thereby preserving the   
   gene   
   >>>>>>>>>> pull.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Oh, so now it’s an “agitated mob”? That’s a huge goalpost   
   move from what   
   >>>>>>>>> you claimed before, namely that any trespasser more than a few feet   
   off the   
   >>>>>>>>> highway was going to be shot, no matter what.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I never used the words "any trespasser".   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Yeah, you pretty much did:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> OH I "pretty much did". LOL   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Because you implied, but did not literally say ‘shoot first, ask   
   questions later’.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Let us see if my original comment was "OK. If cancel culture tries   
   >>>> their shit on my property might need to call them some EMTs". From   
   >>>> that, you have said I said I was going to shoot all trespassers, shoot   
   >>>> first, ask questions later, …   
   >>>   
   >>> Considering that the ‘cancel culture’ pretty much limits themselves   
   >>> to a strongly worded letter to the editor, your comment made it clear   
   >>> that your intent was to perform violence on them.   
   >>>   
   >>>> …that I said I'd use an AR-15 …   
   >>>   
   >>> But as a club: you really do not comprehend satire.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Are you a member of Antifa?   
   >>>   
   >>> Are you asking as a nazi fascist, or merely as a supporter of nazi   
   fascists?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> You'd have to define what was meant in the words "tried their   
   >>>> shit".   
   >>>   
   >>> Already done, because you chose to not do so.   
   >>>   
   >>>> It was already limited to on my property.   
   >>>   
   >>> Which was left vague…conveniently, again.   
   >>>   
   >>>> You should go work for Rush limbaugh as you are a spin expert.   
   >>>   
   >>> You need more experience with IRL legal documents/contracts.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>> …and that by now running as fast as you can away from your own   
   bravado claim,   
   >>>>>>>>> you’re not just a liar, but nothing more than a craven coward too.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> No if a mob …   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You mean, the “mob” that you added after the fact?   
   >>>>>>> And of course you’re claiming that they’re violent too?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> They would have to be.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It is still a change from your originally claimed condition.   
   >>>>> Congratulations on your backpedaling.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> My original condition was " tried their shit on my property". No   
   >>>> back pedaling.   
   >>>   
   >>> Which was not defined… conveniently .. as well as written so that   
   >>> even one kid putting a flier into a mailbox qualified as a “threat”   
   >>> in the way that you wrote it up. Premeditated violence on him.   
   >>>   
   >>>> I believe you want me to make a direct threat. WHY?   
   >>>   
   >>> No need, as you’ve already expressed your intent, in a public forum,   
   >>> which makes it legally discoverable.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>> This is a gun thread and your braggadocio was to do something to them   
   >>>>>>> for which they’d need EMT’s.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If they tried to climb the gate and slipped they would need a EMT.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Is this a fence climbing thread? No, it’s a gun thread.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> To bad you going to Cancel me ROFL.   
   >>>   
   >>> No need: you’ve done it to yourself.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> If they get in the way of traffic on the highway …   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Is this a traffic safety thread? No, it’s a gun thread.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It is whatever I decide to post thread. You going to cancel me ROFL   
   >>>   
   >>> No need: you’ve done it to yourself.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> If you attacked me you'd need a EMT.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I’m attacking you now verbally, so why are you threatening violence?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No, you are not a threat, and what you call an attack is just you   
   >>>> lying and spinning for your agenda. You are a joke. Progressives are   
   >>>> mostly wimps and whiners.   
   >>>   
   >>> On the contrary: by revealing your intent, and in a discoverable fashion,   
   >>> you’ve just opened yourself to a huge amount of liability if anything   
   ever   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)