Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.censorship    |    All matters of censorship in society    |    12,782 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,998 of 12,782    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to OrigInfoJunkie    |
|    Re: Nobody needs an AR-15, dammit!!! (2/    |
|    10 Jun 22 15:26:21    |
      [continued from previous message]              own defenders with those weapons. Even their private security carry the       best modern survival and defense guns that are made.              Which must mean they consider them arms.... and yes they're all "arms"       and are the same ones that "The RIGHT of the people to keep and bear       arms" is labeling arms.              Congress and their DOD and their Secret Service and other security and       self defense operations are using arms. And no Congress and the States       powers do NOT include the power to regulate those arms.              You don't like it then repeal the Constitutional Amendment that says we       have the RIGHT, but it still won't remove the unalienable RIGHT to keep        and bear those arms, because the Constitution and the United States       never created that RIGHT of the people to keep and bear arms. The RIGHT       to keep and bear arms predated the United States.              If you remove the RIGHT to life in the 5th Amendment it still doesn't       allow the United States to summarily execute human life because there is       that pesky unalienable RIGHT to life that still exists              Amendment V       No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous       crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in       cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in       actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be       subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or       limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness       against himself, *nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property* ,       *without* *due process of law* ; nor shall private property be taken for       public use, without just compensation.                     All that Amendment 5 does is tell the United States that the ONLY way       they get to take a human life or your liberty or property is after due       process has been achieved and there is your carve out of power to the       United States, they can do those things provided they meet the due       process clause.              Whare is that clause telling the United States they can regulate the 2nd       Amendment RIGHT of the people to keep and bear arms?              It actually only allow property to be taken *after* due process. So a 3       day waiting period is unconstitutional and needing a licence or permit       is unconstitutional.              What you want is for us to become your slaves and for Democrats to hold       all the political power that comes form the barrel of a gun, and then       you can steal the elections and no one can stop you. What you want is       for us to become the Democrats slaves and for your guns and vaccine       passports to be the chains and shackles.... You want to rebuilt the old       Democrats model of Slavery called the Confederacy, with new and modern       technology and make it NATION WIDE with anyone who isn't of the same       mind and cult as you, being the slaves.                     --       -That's karma-              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca