XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 6/14/22 3:20 PM, -hh wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, June 14, 2022 at 3:02:46 PM UTC-4, David Hartung wrote:   
   >> On 6/14/22 12:51, Siri Cruise wrote:   
   >>> In article   
   >>> <7fa43c91-7c4a-4e29...@googlegroups.com>,   
   >>> Jane Playne  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> You keep using the terms "AR15" and "non-AR15".   
   >>>   
   >>> More whining just to say you're right even though you can't   
   >>> refute doctors.   
   >>   
   >> While you are unable to explain how a shot fired from an AR-15 causes   
   >> more damage than a shot fired from any other high-powered rifle, no   
   >> matter the caliber.   
   >   
   > Hey David, remember this?   
   >   
   > -hh>>> Which is more injurious: one .308, or three .223's?   
   >>   
   > DH > >Would not a better comparison be one .308 vs one .223?   
   >>   
   > -hh> Not really, because of stowed kills: 5.56mm is much smaller/lighter,   
   > -hh> so one can carry ~2.5 more 5.56mm than 7.62mm. As such, the   
   > -hh> performance comparison is done as a 2:1 to 3:1 ratio, both in terms   
   > -hh> of P(h), but also for P(I|h).   
   >   
   > So then, which is likely to be more injurious:  one .308 to the chest, or   
   > two .223's to the chest, plus one more .223 to the head?   
   >   
   > -hh   
   >   
   But then you have to say that it's better to injure as many as possible   
   without killing them so that the enemy is using more energy and time   
   collecting and treating the injured, because they might let the dead lay   
   there but someone attacking you will likely pick up their injured and   
   expend a lot of energy in saving their lives.   
      
   Dead means no one is going to be in a hurry to try to deal with them....   
   the actual "battle tactic sweet spot" is to injure as many as possible   
   without actually killing anyone.   
      
   The police proved it in Texas where they waited an Hour because they say   
   they believed the kids were all dead.  And why risk their lives when the   
   kids were believed to be dead. It's wrong thinking that got the kids   
   killed, it's the belief that you don't need to save anyone unless you   
   "know" they're injured, the belief that if they're alive and OK or   
   already dead you can wait but you only need to act if someone is injured   
   and bleeding to death... that's what killed the children. The people   
   making the policy don't understand the tactics and risks.   
      
      
   This is why we know the People on Psych drugs pretending to be   
   terrorists are NOT well trained operatives.  They don't really   
   understand the idea of what they are attempting to do. They believe   
   killing is the path to what they want.   
      
   The .223 wasn't designed to be the most lethal, so in the real world you   
   should be more worried about the .308 round than the .223 round .   
      
   But the reason the recent shooters use the AR-15/.223 combination is the   
   NEWS MEDIA and DEMOCRATS want them to and will put it on the NEWS if   
   theyuse that gun.... because Democrats and the Media want to get them   
   banned and to do that they have to create the narrative that this   
   particular gun is more DANGEROUS and more feared.  And yet it's just the   
   Democrats propaganda that excites these Mentally ill Democrat shooters   
   that use AR-15's.   
      
   It's the Democrats and the NEWS MEDIA propaganda that's caused the   
   increase in school shooting and the use of the AR-15.  It's on the lips   
   of all the Democrats.  It's their FAKE NARRATIVE and MANTRA that it's   
   the biggest issue and FACEBOOK and TWITTER doesn't ban the Democrats   
   discussing it when it has got "the Ban-Guns" Narrative.  That Narrative   
   is causing the mentally ill and delusional people to try to do what the   
   Democrats and the DEMOCRAT Media want.   
      
   Which means the real instigation for the mass shootings is the   
   Democratic Party. The more they push gun ban's the more shootings there are.   
      
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   .   
   *GUN CONFISCATORS ONE AND ALL*   
      
   In the Senate, you can always count on Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK),   
   Susan Collins (R-ME), and Mitt Romney (R-UT) to do the wrong thing. You   
   can always count on Reps. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) to   
   do the wrong thing.   
      
   Every TRUE AMERICAN should give Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Anthony   
   Gonzalez (R-OH), Chris Jacobs (R-NY), John Katko (R-NY), Adam Kinzinger   
   (R-IL), Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), Maria Salazar (R-FL), Chris Smith   
   (R-NJ), Michael Turner (R-OH), and Fred Upton (R-MI) a call about this vote.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)