home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.censorship      All matters of censorship in society      12,782 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,029 of 12,782   
   BeamMeUpScotty to Siri Cruise   
   Re: Taxpayers Forced To Fund Private Rel   
   22 Jun 22 17:58:59   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 6/22/22 3:55 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:   
   > In article   
   > <458034ed-23e6-4b1b-a0ba-341f0fe7aad9n@googlegroups.com>,   
   >  B Hasselback  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 1:06:42 PM UTC-5, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Actually supporting any "education" other than those stated in the   
   >>> Constitution as being United States delegated power is a VIOLATION of   
   >>> the Constitution, so Federal support of "education" using Federal   
   >>> APPROPRIATION LAWS or TAX LAWS passed into law by Congress and/or the   
   >>> President is UnConstitutional.   
   >>   
   >> LOL...our resident "Constitutional scholar" weighs in...thanks!   
      
   Thanks I love when you call me that... but I figure that if an average   
   guy like me can figure it out, we don't need scholars to tell us what it   
   says do we?  And the education that the Democrat influenced schools   
   offer are proof that the Federal Government isn't the answer to the   
   problem.  And where do we get those scholars from, those very same   
   Democrat influenced schools. Not a good selling point for having more of   
   the same.   
      
   >   
   > Schools are run by states which have power beyond Article 1.   
      
   True enough they have jurisdiction since the United States Government   
   has no power delegated for education for any supremacy clause   
   application or infraction. That includes Appropriations laws. The Feds   
   have ZERO delegated power also known as jurisdiction, to implement any   
   laws or appropriations funding.  It's NOT the job of the Federal   
   Government to educate WE THE PEOPLE.  NOT as welfare or religion or as a   
   secular education. There is no Federal delegated power that applies.   
      
   >   
   > I suppose we can fight over Department of Education, but that's   
   > not the hill I want to die on.   
   >   
      
   The point I was making is that they are the same hill... NO delegated   
   power to engage in religious appropriations laws or engage in education   
   appropriations laws.   
      
   The United States has no power to make laws that spend money that isn't   
   for a delegated power.   
      
      
      
   > Note that if a state does provide schools, the 14th Amendment   
   > applies to them.   
      
   Yes I agree.  And States can engage in education, I see nothing that   
   denies the State Jurisdictions the power to pay for education, but that   
   doesn't mean that the United States Government can pay the States bills   
   for what they spend on education. They are separate jurisdictions. The   
   fact that the States have the power to educate if they choose doesn't   
   mean the Federal Government has any JURISDICTION to make laws to educate   
   or pay for states to educate people.  And that's the same for religious   
   educations...  While the Feds can't pay for religious education they   
   also can't pay for secular educations they have NO delegated power to   
   make the laws which means no power to make appropriations laws for   
   secular education or religious education.   
      
   The feds are playing outside their league, violating the contract.   
      
   They might be able to slide a NATIONAL SECURITY law in to fund the   
   schools being secured and hardened against interstate and international   
    terrorists. That would be for the USSC to argue about.   
      
   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/06/21/supreme-cou   
   t-rules-state-and-local-government-cannot-ban-faith-based-school   
   -from-public-funding/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign   
   supreme-court-rules-state-and-local-government-cannot-ban-   
   faith-based-schools-from-public-funding   
      
   All schools are banned from Federal funding of "education" according to   
   the Constitution and Amendment 10.   
      
   Here you go.... States that have jurisdiction over both religion and   
   education and are told by the Corrupt USSC that they don't have   
   jurisdiction if the Federal Government wants to give money to private   
   religion or private EDUCATION... Money that the Federal Government has   
   ZERO delegated power and jurisdiction to offer to give to them because   
   it violates the U.S. Constitution for the Congress to make the   
   appropriations laws to spend the money on religious or secular education.   
      
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca