XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.poltics.democrats.d   
   XPost: talk.poltics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 6/24/22 2:34 PM, Michael A Terrell wrote:   
   > On 6/24/2022 11:16 AM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who   
   > rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled   
   > and lied:   
   >   
   >   
   >> On 6/24/22 12:55 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >>> On 6/24/2022 9:48 AM, Francis Mark Hansen , sleazy   
   >>> rent-skip chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:   
   >>>   
   >>> Ha ha ha ha ha!   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 6/24/2022 10:33 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >>>>> On 6/24/2022 8:59 AM, Francis Mark Hansen ,   
   >>>>> sleazy rent-skip chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut,   
   >>>>> lied:   
   >>>   
   >>> Ha ha ha ha ha!   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> On 6/23/2022 7:41 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 6/23/2022 5:09 PM, David Hartung wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 6/23/22 15:52, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> "Properly interpreted, the Second Amendment allows a ‘variety’ of   
   >>>>>>>>> gun regulations."   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Brett Kavanaugh in concurrence to today's New York gun law opinion   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Now you like Kavanaugh?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> He reinforces my point:  the right to arms is not unlimited   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The line for protected weapons is not where you wish it was.   
   >>>>   [erase bullshit]   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I don't claim to know where the line is drawn.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Then why bother mentioning it at all?   
   >>>   
   >>> Because you say there's no line, Francis.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> You say there is no line at all.   
   >>>> You're lying.  I never said any such thing.   
   >>>   
   >>> No, *you* are lying, Francis.  You don't believe there is any line.  You   
   >>> believe the right is unlimited, Francis.  You're wrong, of course.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Actually there is no line or limit on arms,   
   >   
   > Yes, there is.  Scalia told you there is, and he's right.   
   >   
   >        Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is   
   >        *not unlimited*   
      
   Exactly...   
      
      
      
   The *RIGHT secured* by the 2nd Amendment in it's entirety... is limited   
   to "arms".  The right of the people to keep and bear "space ships" or   
   "clown shoes" is NOT protected by the 2nd Amendment. It is limited to   
   "arms".  Meaning you can't keep and bear things that aren't arms, and   
   claim the 2nd amendment protects that item.   
      
   But the "RIGHT to keep and bear" is still unlimited and when it comes to   
   "arms" they are protected and it's unlimited also. The limitation is   
   created when they made it *NOT UNLIMITED* by adding the word "arms".   
      
      
   And "arms" is a term that covers an unspecified number of items. SO   
   anything called  or specified in law as arms, are also secured as a   
   RIGHT of the people to KEEP and BEAR.   
      
   Sadly Democrats can't read and comprehend reality.   
      
   Democrats seem to suffer from BLUE PILL syndrome...  they never choose   
   the red pill.  It's reality and accepting reality is just not within the   
   intellectual grasp of Democrats.   
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)