XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 6/27/22 10:15 PM, -hh wrote:   
   > On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 8:28:45 PM UTC-4, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:50:13 -0700 (PDT), -hh says...   
   >> Wait until he realizes that the legal ramifications of this ruling require   
   him   
   >> to unwillingly surrender one of his kidneys when a recipient is found.   
   >> -hh   
   >> This is why all winger lose every argument. You all are fucked in the head.   
   >>   
   >> Imagine... grown men arguing for abortion rights. What a bunch of pussies.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Except it isn’t about this one procedure.  It’s about if we have a   
   fundamental   
   > right to the freedom of self-determination, or we do not.   
   >   
   > If women don’t have it, then men don’t either.   
   >   
   > -hh   
   >   
   You miss the FACT that by your own use of "we" in  *if we have a*   
   *fundamental right to the freedom of self-determination* you are   
   ignoring that it includes the human life that *we* created. It has   
   become part of the "we" when it was created. SO where is that "we" for   
   the gestating baby in the uterus?   
      
   You have a right to your life as long as you don't use it to kill other   
   human life, when you murder you pay the price and sometimes that price   
   includes your own life.   
      
   Which means that killing a gestating human life that is innocent of any   
   crimes is NOT included as one of your RIGHTS to "freedom of self   
   determination" because that human life is NOT "yours to terminate". If   
   it were then the man who created it would also have that power and he   
   doesn't. SO creating a life doesn't come with the power or fundamental   
   RIGHT to kill it like owning a slave might come with the power to kill   
   them.  Today we understand that a human life is NOT property and is   
   independent of you whether you created it or are responsible for it's   
   safety or not.  Parents can keep the human life they created secure and   
   safe and educated, they can't kill the life they created. Just as it's   
   NOT OK to tell us that God made someone kill someone else, regardless of   
   whether God did tell them it's still NOT acceptable that God who create   
   that life according to that killer, for God to kill them. Which is why   
   we attempt to save lives even when what kills them is called by some, an   
   act of God.   
      
   You have every RIGHT to NOT have sex or pay for any impregnation or be   
   forced by government to become pregnant through artificial means or get   
   a vaccine that gestates a new partially human life in every cell as you   
   gestate through a metamorphosis into a different type of Genetically   
   Modified human Organism .   
      
   What you don't and the government does NOT have is the right to kill an   
   innocent life that has not been duly convicted and is not trying to kill   
   you.   
      
   When you do try to kill someone then you need to prove to a jury that it   
   was self defense as Karl Rittenhouse was forced to do. You see actions   
   have consequences, and Democrats chose to put Rittenhouse on trial for   
   self defense and forced him to prove he was innocent which meant that   
   millions of people, possibly hundreds of millions saw that when someone   
   kills another human life it now requires due process...   Face it,   
   Democrats are stupid, so stupid they shot themselves in the foot when   
   they started prosecuting people who didn't agree with them on the issue   
   of self defense. All be it that Democrats were attacking the Second   
   Amendment but by doing so they pointed out that abortion on demand kills   
   an innocent human life *without due process* and somewhere in the back   
   of their minds it stuck.   
      
   In short, Democrat are so stupid that they did this to themselves with   
   their own actions.   
      
   It is funny that Democrats are never satisfied with the DAMAGE they do   
   and always want to destroy more... their need to kill outside the uterus   
   with post birth abortions showed the duplicity... it isn't about the   
   *fundamental right to the freedom of self-determination* when Democrats   
   want to kill the human life after it was born, it's about them wanting   
   to kill. Because a post birth human life is no longer connected to self   
   determination for the mother.  It's just a pure psychopath need to kill.   
      
   What Democrats did was show who they really are. And the Supreme Court   
   saw that their *CONTRADICTIONS* by DEMOCRAT Justices in their opinions   
   were eroding any trust in their decisions that they ever had.   
      
   *Democrat Policy is unsustainable, self destructive and contradicting*   
      
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)