XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics
XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama
XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,
lt.politics.trump
XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse
XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars
XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,
alt.politics.guns
From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov
On 6/28/22 11:19 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 6/27/2022 3:53 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 6/27/22 00:00, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> In article
>>> ,
>>> Jane Playne wrote:
>>>
>>>> What do you think was the intent and purpose of the 2nd Amendment?
>>>
>>> So you do think they envisionned a 12.7 machine gun at a thousand
>>> musket balls a minute.
>>>
>>> Some of us see minor qualitative differences between the weapons
>>> of today and the weapons of the second amendment.
>>
>> "Weapons of the second amendment"? Wouldn't that be those weapons that
>> would be a soldier's standard equipment?
>
> Members of the militia in 1776 didn't have the same equipment as
> soldiers in the Continental Army had.
>
> There is no unorganized militia today resembling the unorganized militia
> in 1776.
>
> You don't have a right to an RPG or an AR-15.
Your RIGHT isn't to belong to a Militia... your RIGHT is to KEEP and
BEAR ARMS... it has zero to do with the RIGHTS of the militia... but
what it does means is that since the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND
BEAR ARM is totally of the people and there is NO U.S. GOVERNMENT or
Sates power to regulate THAT RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE and when a POWER is not
delegated to the United States and is denied to the States by the U.S.
Constitution, it means that the ONLY thing left is the Amendment 10 last
part that says; "or to the people"
Amendment X
*The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution* ,
nor *prohibited by it to the States* , *are reserved* to the States
respectively, or *to the people* .
Amendment 10 agrees with Amendment 2 aand the logic is there and follows
the basic constitution process of seperate jurisdictions having separate
powers. And When a power/right is specifically assigned as a RIGHT OF
THE PEOPLE, it is denying that power to the States and if it was never
delegated to the United STates then it is clear that it's a RIGHT ONLY
of the people and the States and the United States have both been passed
over for being delegated that or being allowed to gain it by default
since it was denied to the States, when the 2nd Amendmnet says it's "THE
RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE".
*Follow the logic created by the Constittuion*
We dohave the RIGHT to own an AR-15 and more.
The place where the Governmnet can possiblyargue their power would be
with what are "arms" and what are weapons.
Arms are probably more self defence weapons while teh broader scope of
"weapons" are all of that plus the weapons of
mass-destruction/mass-killing that fall under the definition of
"weapons" for strategicuse to cause mass casualtie, but NOT personal
arms for tactical use.
And since Democrats don't consider Chicago to be mass casualties it will
require more deaths than what we see in Chicago in a weekend to cause
those to be considered mass casualties. It takes a damn huge bomb or
Bioweapons or Chemical weapons to cause those kinds of mass casualties.
An AR-15 is a survival weapon, NOT a weapon that causes mass casualties.
In a room filled with people holding AR-15's who would be the mass
casualties? It would likely be less than 50% who are killed.
--
-That's karma-
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
