XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 6/28/22 6:27 PM, Scout wrote:   
   > On 6/28/2022 1:00 PM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who   
   > rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled   
   > and lied:   
   >   
   >> On 6/28/22 3:54 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:20:10 -0700, an incel dwarf wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 6/28/2022 12:12 PM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard   
   >>>> who rode   
   >>>> his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled   
   >>>> and lied:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 6/28/22 1:32 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >>>>>> It just isn't.  It's a human life, and it's even a person, but it   
   >>>>>> is not a   
   >>>>>> full person, and that's why a substantial majority of people have   
   >>>>>> no problem   
   >>>>>> with expelling or evicting it from the uterus of a woman who   
   >>>>>> doesn't want it   
   >>>>>> inside her.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It is a human life and a gestating baby or pre-birth baby and   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's not a full rights-holding person.   
   >>>   
   >>> Neither is a 16 year old,   
   >   
   > Ha ha ha!  HA HA HA HA HA!  I see kleine klauschen "no-foreskin"   
   > Schittenkike still thinks I see his posts.  I don't.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> And so many laws that are meant to protect children that aren't laws   
   >> against children doing it they are against the adult doing it with a   
   >> kid and   
   >   
   > The embryo is not a full person and does not have all the rights that a   
   > full person has.   
      
   An embryo is not a "slave" or to be killed as punishment for a crime   
   where the party shall have been "duly convicted". Without due process to   
   establish having been duly convicted.   
      
   Kill anyone NOT having full rights like Felons...? Blacks didn't have   
   full RIGHTS and Democrats made them slaves. You could make the embryo a   
   slave... except the 13th amendment says:   
      
   Amendment XIII   
   Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a   
   punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,   
   shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their   
   jurisdiction.   
      
      
   *It says nothing about having to be a person to NOT be a slave* , it   
   says slavery can only exist as punishment... which means owning and   
   killing a human life that is still an embryo must be punishment for a   
   crime whereof the party (be they embryo at the beginning of life or gray   
   haired geriatric adult at the last day of life) shall have been duly   
   convicted... shall exist in the united states.   
      
   I don't see the embryo as a duly convicted embryo that is a human life   
   being a slave that can be enslaved or killed by the owner.  Because   
   there is no owner of the human life in the uterus.  It's impossible to   
   make it a slave or to kill it without it being duly convicted. No due   
   process no crime no self defense... it makes abortion murder.   
      
   Democrats want you to believe, you can't enslave a human life in the   
   uterus until it's duly convicted, but you can kill that same human life   
   without it being duly convicted. That isn't logical. And according to   
   the 13th Amendment you can't have slavery unless "the party" be they an   
   embryo human life or an adult human life, anywhere within the U.S.   
   Jurisdiction.   
      
   Interesting that the people saving the BLACK SLAVES wrote an amendment   
   that protected all human life because the term used was (the party),   
   from slavery for anything but punishment, but they didn't consider that   
   the human life had such a low value before it was outside the uterus   
   that murdering the black human life inside the protected uterus was   
   still permitted without it also being called punishment. Which suggests   
   that Democrats would MURDER BLACKS in the Blacks uterus while at the   
   same time NOT allowing them to be enslaved unless the embryo was duly   
   convicted first. According to Democrat logic... killing the human life   
   as an "embryo" is OK, you just can't make it a slave while in the uterus   
   or outside the uterus unless or until it's duly convicted.   
      
   Considering Democrats supported BLACK LIVES MATTER why would those same   
   Democrats determine that a black human life inside a uterus doesn't   
   matter? SO when someone said all lives matter Democrats got upset   
   because they knew that if *ALL LIVES MATTER* that it would include human   
   lives inside a uterus.  And Democrats planned eugenics and their   
   continued organized genocide couldn't continue if all lives mattered.   
      
     I think we found the failure in the Democrat logic. And it points to   
   their duplicity once again. Democrats pretend to protect human life and   
   yet they only want to protect some human life that they decide is worthy   
   or needed at the moment to satisfy their own narcissistic lust for power.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)