XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.infowar, alt.politics.guns, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d   
   From: noway@nospam.com   
      
   On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 14:01:33 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty   
    scrawled in blood:   
      
   >On 7/2/22 12:54 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 01 Jul 2022 21:18:27 -0400, governor.swill@gmail.com   
   >> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 01 Jul 2022 18:19:54 -0400, Attila <   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Which is unimportant compared to the risks a pregnant woman   
   >>>> runs.   
   >>>   
   >>> You are really a piece of work.   
   >>>   
   >>> I HAVE ALREADY STATED PLAINLY THAT ABORTION SHOULD BE ALLOWED IN THE   
   >>> CASE OF HEALTH RISK TO THE MOTHER.  I HAVE STATED THIS POSITION MANY   
   >>> TIMES.   
   >>>   
   >>> YOU JUST WANT TO ARGUE.   
   >>>   
   >>> *flush*   
   >>>   
   >>> Swill   
   >>   
   >> Every pregnancy is a risk to the woman involved.   
   >>   
   >Compounding the risk of pregnancy with abortion and unknown cancer   
      
   	You know, I've never actually seen even ONE study to back that   
   up.   
      
   >and   
   >other risks like allergic reactions and bleeding then those risk NOT   
   >just the mother but it straight-up attempts to kill the baby that if the   
   >mother knew she was going to die might decide to save the baby and   
   >accept her own death at the time of birth.   
      
   	Ah, the "noble sacrifice" lunacy.   
      
      
   Don   
   aa#51   
   o- DNRC   
   Jedi Slackmaster   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)