XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 7/2/22 5:24 PM, Don Kresch wrote:   
   > On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 14:41:06 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty   
   >  scrawled in blood:   
   >   
   >> On 7/2/22 11:13 AM, Somebody too wrote:   
   >   
   >>>> Under no other conditions does this requirement exist.   
   >>   
   >> I say it does, you can't kill a person because they make your life   
   >> inconvenient.   
   >   
   > 	Lovely strawman.   
   >   
   > 	   
   >> You have to feed your baby after you give birth   
   >   
   > 	No, you don't. You can give up the custodianship.   
   >   
      
   Yes you do because if you give-up the parental roll you are no longer   
   able to call it your baby. It's NO longer your responsibility so you   
   don't have to feed a baby that isn't yours and you can let other babies   
   starve... but I think they can also arrest you for allowing other babies   
   to starve while you watch.   
      
   It starts to get into crimes against humanity...  or mental illness issues.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>> If a fetus is not a person she has a medical condition that   
   >>>> is easily remedied.   
   >>   
   >> How was that medical condition created?   
   >   
   > 	How was a broken bone playing football created?   
      
   Accidental or by force by other players. Could be either way, who chose   
   for you to play the game?   
      
   Were you forced to be there? Are the injuries life threatening, is there   
   a reason to risk surgery to improve the outcome? What if the Doctor says   
   I can go in and grind on the bone and do multiple surgeries on that bone   
   to fit it back to be the same and add more bone where it is too   
   splintered but you'll never throw a ball again and I'll have to take the   
   piece of bone from your leg which will weaken the leg bone.   
      
      
   What you have is a lot of risk and the broken bone can never be   
   "unbroken" so it will always be too weak to perform at 100% for sports.   
      
   Like a woman trying to undo a pregnancy, it may solve some issued like   
   feeding a baby and create others and the woman did make the decision to   
   play the game, and if she didn't then that's a crime and time for prison   
   for someone but killing a baby doesn't make the crime go away or reverse   
   the broken persons injuries.   
      
   Once again you have a case of NOT being able to unring the bell, someone   
   made a decision and they end up paying for it and the victim in a crime   
   can't always be made whole by convicting the guilty party when that   
   decision is made for the woman. But again the human life in the uterus   
   isn't the guilty party and is essentially a victim the same as the woman   
   that was attacked. If we kill the life in the uterus why wouldn't we   
   kill the woman too, which is what the Cults of the RADICALIZED MUSLIMS   
   DO.  A woman who is raped is stoned to death.   
      
   They abort the baby by killing all the victims? Is that what Democrats   
   want, yes radicalized Democrat feminists and abortionists are radical   
   LGBTQ cult members and yes they do threaten the Supreme Court Justices   
   and the rest of us like the radical Muslim cults do....   
      
   It sound's like Democrats are traveling down the same path as the Muslim   
   Terrorists.   
      
   I say it's NOT that the woman has to raise the child but killing it in   
   the uterus is NOT erasing that the human life was created. That human   
   life did live on planet earth and you can only kill that HUMAN LIFE   
   once. But you have to live it every day for the rest of your life if you   
   kill a human life.   
      
      
   >   
   > 	Are you going to be consistent and say that no sports injuries   
   > can be fixed? Because if you don't say that: you're a hypocrite.   
      
   I got to this point and see I was consistent, I didn't say that NO   
   sports injury could be fixed I said some create more risk than the   
   repair is worth and some can't be fixed and some simply increase side   
   effects of things like cancer or sterility and create new problems and   
   that killing a human life that was NOT guilty of a crime will never   
   unring the bell and the damage done by the crime committed against them   
   or make the fact they they willingly created a life go away.  SO yes I   
   say killing the human life that is innocent is an injury that can't be   
   fixed, just like all murder creates injuries that can't be fixed because   
   you can never bring the dead back from that. Neither the physical or   
   mental damage from pregnancy can be fixed like it never happened because   
   it did and attempting to erase it by killing the human life in he uterus   
   only compounds the injury both mentally and physically.   
      
   *Democrat Policy is unsustainable, self destructive and contradicting*   
      
   Of course you could stone to death the mother and human life in the   
   uterus. If no one really wants the pregnancy.   
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)