XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 7/8/22 2:53 PM, -hh wrote:   
   > On Friday, July 8, 2022 at 10:36:13 AM UTC-4, Klaus  Schadenfreude wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:32:41 -0700, Rudy Canoza    
   >> wrote:   
   >>> naturalization test in order to vote,   
   >>>   
   >>> Literacy tests for voting are unconstitutional, o oozing scarlet red   
   maxipad.   
   >>> Looks like you failed your own test.   
   >>>   
   >>> You dumb mackerel-reeking cunt.   
   >>   
   >> Try using a dictionary, you stupid cunt   
   >   
   > He did.   
   >   
   >> He never said anything about literacy.   
   >   
   > Except it was, because passing a 'naturalization test' requires literacy,   
   either in the   
   > primary definition:  1) "the ability to read and write", or as competence on   
   a topic,   
   > as per the word's secondary definition: 2) "knowledge of a particular   
   subject, or   
   > a particular type of knowledge"*   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > * OED's phrasing is: "competence or knowledge in a specified area"   
   >   
   > TL;DR:  poll taxes & poll tests have both been determined to be   
   unconstitutional,   
   > with loophole attempts closed off by the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which   
   also   
   > included property-ownership requirements, and moral character tests too.   
   >   
   >    
      
   I'm interested in knowing why Democrats think Americans should pay taxes   
   to a Government that has refused to protect those taxpayers from a   
   foreign invasion? The Constitution is an agreement that says if the   
   Government does this then we the people will do that...  but since the   
   United States Government is in breach of contract, what is our impetus   
   to pay them tax money they committed FRAUD to try to get?  Yes it's   
   FRAUD to take money for services that they never intended to deliver.   
      
   Article I   
   Section 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes,   
   Duties, Imposts and Excises, *to pay* the Debts and *provide for the*   
   *common Defence* ...   
      
      
   Notice the word *SHALL* and how it's used in these Articles...  it is a   
   mandate that says they do have a legal mandate to perform those duties.   
      
      
   Article IV   
   Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this   
   Union a Republican Form of Government, and *shall protect each of them*   
   *against Invasion* ...   
      
   So far the Democrats have failed to do any of that after the last   
   Presidential election in 2020 so why would we the people be interested   
   in sending them any FEDERAL tax dollars when they failed to hold up   
   their part of this contract? Shouldn't we stop payment and press charges   
   for FRAUD as is the case with all cases of FRAUD?   
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)