XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 7/11/22 2:50 PM, Fred J McCall wrote:   
   > On 7/11/2022 11:26 AM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who   
   > rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled   
   > and lied:   
   >   
   >> On 7/11/22 12:55 PM, Scout wrote:   
   >>> Hartung pretends to care about "scientific facts" in considering   
   >>> abortion.   
   >>>   
   >>>     "Scientific fact: Life begins at conception when the egg and the   
   >>> sperm join."   
   >>>   
   >>> This is meaningless.  The question is not whether or not the zygote,   
   >>> blastocyst, embryo or fetus is "life."  The question is not even if   
   >>> it is human life.   
   >>>   
   >>> The question is, is it a rights-holding *person*, and if so, *what*   
   >>> rights does it hold?   
   >>   
   >> How do you think RIGHTS are endowed to a HUMAN LIFE?   
   >   
   > Not every human life has all rights at all times.  That's why I keep   
   > posing the excellent question:  does a human embryo have a right to an   
   > AR-15?  If so, how is the right claimed and how is it enforced?  If not,   
   > why not?   
   >   
   > You can't answer.  That's because you're a retarded brain-damaged   
   > shit-pail.   
      
   Do you have to be aware of your RIGHT to life in order to have it   
   respected by the government that is mandated to respect it?   
      
   If you are Black, do you have a RIGHT to LIBERTY... even if /or/ when   
   you do, you don't know you do?   
      
   Were slaves... slaves because they had no human rights to life ,liberty   
   or property  "because GOVERNMENT hadn't written it down yet"  or because   
   the SLAVES THEMSELVES didn't know they had those RIGHTS?  Or was it   
   because SLAVES had those RIGHTS of life, liberty, property all along and   
   Democrats treated them as if they weren't persons because Democrats have   
   a problem and it's NOT the people they TREAT as SLAVES that have a   
   problem.   
      
   And as I remember history, the Republicans were the ones that didn't   
   abide with SLAVERY for anyone but criminals who were being punished for   
   a duly convicted crime.   
      
   Which meant abortion and slavery are the crimes and reapecting the   
   RIGHTS of a HUMAN LIFE in the uterus and the RIGHTS of a HUMAN LIFE NOT   
   of your gender or creede or color or beliefs is the   moral and legal   
   and Constitutional thing to do.   
      
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)