XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 7/14/22 12:02 PM, Lee wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > So much for states’ rights:   
   > Republicans target out-of-   
   > state abortions   
   > 07/13/22   
   >   
   > As the Washington Post reported,   
   > anti-abortion organizations are   
   > working on model legislation that   
   > would stop women from obtaining   
   > out-of-state abortions. “Just   
   > because you jump across a state   
   > line doesn’t mean your home state   
   > doesn’t have jurisdiction,” said   
   > Peter Breen, senior counsel for   
   > the Thomas More Society. At a   
   > conference of the National   
   > Association of Christian Lawmakers,   
   > Okla. state Rep. Todd Russ  spoke   
   > in favor of preventing women from   
   > obtaining abortions across state   
   > lines. “If somebody was driving   
   > the getaway car in a bank robbery,”   
   > he cautioned, “it is a very, very   
   > serious crime.” Kristan Hawkins,   
   > president of Students for Life,   
   > put it more bluntly. “Look, if   
   > you travel out of state for an   
   > abortion, that abortionist can   
   > be held liable.”   
   >   
   > The Dobbs decision may not, as   
   > Alito rationalized, simply allow   
   > “each State to regulate abortion   
   > as its citizens wish.” We may   
   > instead be headed toward years of   
   > interstate battles, in which the   
   > reddest states attempt to extend   
   > the reach of their extreme anti-   
   > abortion statutes beyond their   
   > borders, penalizing the exercise   
   > of reproductive choice even in   
   > states where women’s right to   
   > abortion is protected by law.   
   >   
   > https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3555732-so-much-for-states-rights-   
   > republicans-target-out-of-state-abortions/   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   If there is any interest in stopping the travel it should be for under   
   aged girls being given the funds by their rapist or other adults to   
   travel or the physical transporting of the underage person for the   
   purpose of sex or abortion, to get to a state with no laws or lighter   
   sentences for those crimes.   
      
   That way "abducting a child and running to another State"  for abortions   
   or marriage or sex with an under-age person because the child agrees to   
   go won't get the pedophile a way out. Like returning a criminal for to   
   face trial for a crime, the crimes would begin in the originating state   
   NOT the one the pedophile fled to. And it wouldn't simply be a   
   kidnapping that would have to be proven it would allow them more avenues   
   to charge the pedophiles.   
      
   NOT so much that I want more laws (I don't) but children apparently need   
   more protections given the LGBTQ+Disney grooming and human trafficking   
   and pedophelia going on these days. And if the laws are directed at   
   people who are committing crimes against children... then they should be   
   carefully crafted to only go after the criminals who abuse kids.   
      
      
   --   
   -That's karma-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)