XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.politics.economics   
   XPost: alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama   
   XPost: alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.politics.socialism.mao,    
   lt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars   
   XPost: alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,   
   alt.politics.guns, alt.socially.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.athieism   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 7/21/22 1:36 AM, FaileyCat wrote:   
   > On 7/21/2022 4:36 AM, shit-4-braincell lied:   
   >   
   >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:45:38 -0700, Rudy Canoza    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Yes, you /can/ get it even if you're vaccinated, but you're less   
   >>> likely to get   
   >>> it.  If you don't get it, you can't transmit it to others.  Getting   
   >>> vaccinated   
   >>> reduces your chance of getting it, so it reduces your overall chance of   
   >>> transmitting it to others.  "my body my choice" does not apply.   
      
   Of course it does apply since your immune system is is suppressed and   
   blood clots and future immunity to other diseases is relevant.   
      
   You can't forcibly inject others with a carcinogen that causes cancer 10   
   or 20 years down the road, and therefore can't inject them with an   
   immune system suppressor which causes a form of AIDS "auto immune   
   deficiency syndrome" that will allow cancers and other diseases to make   
   the person sick or die.   
      
   All the law suits over cancer causing carcinogens are about doing what   
   you're suggesting, causing cancer by NOT telling the public that it a   
   carcinogen and that's equal to taking away their choice when anyone like   
   the cigarette companies hide that information.   
      
   *Taking away the choice is precisely the issue* be it taking it away by   
   lying and selling the cigarettes by lying about the damage they do or by   
   mandating forced vaccinations.  Be it a chemical or BIO-weapon that   
   suppresses the immune system to allow the cancers.diseases or be it the   
   direct carcinogen linked to the cancer or disease.   
      
   >>>   
   >>> If you do get it, the likelihood of transmitting it to others depends   
   >>> in part on   
   >>> your viral load.  The higher the viral load, the higher the chance   
   >>> you transmit...   
      
   Then anyone with symptoms should stay home from work and all the work   
   rules that encourage people to work while sick should be removed during   
   the times that there is a significant rise in the number of people who   
   test positive. Encourage people to stay home when sick with a cold or   
   flu or when a Chinese/World-Health-Organization  Bio-Weapon has been   
   released.   
      
   >>> it to others.  Being vaccinated reduces your viral load if you do   
   >>> catch it, so   
   >>> it reduces your chance of transmitting it to others.  Once again, "my   
   >>> body my   
   >>> choice" doesn't apply.   
      
      
   Sure it does since the proof that it reduces the spread of the virus is   
   all conjecture, you have no proof, just as you say there is no proof the   
   masks don't work so you can mandate them, there is no proof that the   
   vaccine reduces the spread of the virus but if you feel it helps you   
   more than it hurts you then you should get the vaccine just like you can   
   smoke if it's going make "you" happy. You know that smoking has negative   
   effects on your health but while we can't force you to smoke precisely   
   because it is a Democrat established "hazard to your health" we also   
   can't force you to be injected with an immune system destructive mRNA   
   injection that is not proven to live up to it's advertised propaganda   
   and is hazardous to your health.   
      
      
   >>> "my body my choice" applies *only* to situations where it truly is   
   >>> only your   
   >>> body.   
      
   That means that the Abortion RIGHT was never a RIGHT since it is NOT   
   only "your" body when it kills another human life? And it means States   
   can't allow State RIGHTS to allow abortion because it's harmful to the   
   health of the fetus which is a human life.   
      
   We know abortion is detrimental to others lives since a human life is   
   ended in every abortion except a failed abortion.   
      
   >>> COVID-19 is not such a situation.  "my body my choice" does   
   >>> not apply in   
   >>> public health situations.   
      
   An abortion sis a PUBLIC HEALTH SITUATION since a million human lives   
   are are part of "the public" and we know that it's the abortion doing   
   the killing.   
      
   What you don't know is that a lack of an mRNA shot is the cause of   
   anyone dying.  Where is the proof that lives were saved by the vaccine.   
   *Show me the money* where is the proof that someone didn't die and it's   
   all due to the mRNA vaccine, or show where a million lives were saved   
   from dying of the Wuhan virus thanks only to the vaccine.  I can show   
   you where a million people would have survived had those abortions not   
   taken place.   
      
      
   >>> This is settled.  Getting your teeth straightened only affects your   
   >>> body.   
      
   Unless you have AIDS and risk spreading it as was done by dentistry when   
   AIDS was spreading faster and probably still happens on occasion and we   
   know the VA was reusing those injection pens that spread AIDS and that   
   colonoscopies were causing more AIDS cases... so having AIDS and being   
   quarantined was prevented by Democrats who said AIDS patients could NOT   
   be quarantined...  or separated from the public. Even now they are   
   starting to allow gay men who spread AIDS, to donate blood when we know   
   gays are at a higher risk of having AIDS.  SO being higher risk   
   apparently is NOT the issue here.   
      
   *Which begs the question of what the real issue is* ?   
      
   >>> Increasing the likelihood that you'll transmit a serious illness does   
   >>> not only   
   >>> affect your body.   
      
   As we see Democrats don't care about spreading disease or death by   
   spreading the things that cause sickness or death.  Which means that   
   there is a duplicitous deception going on. You might even call it a   
   conspiracy, except it's pretty obvious for a conspiracy, it's just   
   outright FRAUD, wire fraud and mail fraud and medical fraud.   
      
   Democrats want to allow gays and abortions to flourish despite any risks   
   or deaths caused by their policies of abortion and LGBTQ rights.   
      
   But when it comes to your RIGHTS that are for more than the 2% of the   
   population, Democrats are willing to deny them.  Why allow RIGHTS for   
   only 2% or 3% of the population that spreads death while denying other   
   rights to the 98% of the population... unless it's duplicity. The   
   Democrats can claim they're for the RIGHTS of the people while they   
   actually deny rights to 98% of the people, unless they CHAMPION the   
   RIGHTS of the 2%. But it's NOT just stupidity that's the reason they do   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)